-
115 pts115 ptslesterJuly 16, 2017 at 4:11 pm #2064
HookEcho,
I believe interrelation between our two methods may be a reality with reference to Burma… I have been digging a little deeper !!You may recall at the beginning of this thread, I was demonstrating correlation between co-ordinates 26.31’E – 38.85’N Lesvos Basin, Western Turkey (6.3 epicentre June 12) and co-ordinates 70.716’E – 26.510’S Triple Junction, Central Indian Ocean Ridge.
On Friday July 14 2017, a Class M 2.4 solar flux event occurred, according to Lockheed solar data (Imsal.com) the event started at 01:07 UTC. At 01:07 UTC, it was Dawn on 26.31’E – 38.85’N Lesvos Basin. The event peaked at 02:09 UTC… it was Sunrise on 70.716’E – 26.510’S Triple Junction at 02:09 UTC !!
If you check the Ace EPAMp monitor today (July 16) it shows a three day increase in low energy protons peaked at 05:45 UTC. This coincides with the arrival of the CME related to said flux event, as reported by Spaceweather.com. The positional longitude of the sun at this time was 95.294’E, I missed a hit on Sumatra because I misjudged deduction. 05:45 UTC -8 LS works out as 05:37 UTC, the positional longitude of the sun would then become 97.286’E… same longitude as 10 km’s North of Hpasawng, Kayah Province, Burma !!
I discovered that had you not mentioned Burma, I probably would have ended up there anyway…
Dusk on co-ordinates 97.286’E – 18.920’N Burma … 13:33 UTC, July 15 16:35:22 utc
Sunset on co-ordinates 81.860’E – 27.940’N Nepal … 13:33 UTC, July 15 (Lester:June 29, 06:36 pm)
(2017-07-15 16:35:22 UTC, M 4.4 India/Nepal border … 81.13’E – 28.30’N)Dawn on co-ordinates 97.286’E – 18.920’N Burma … 21:42 UTC July 15
Dawn on co-ordinates 82.200’E – 36.120’N Western Xizang … 21:42 UTC July 15 (Lester: July 2, 12:06 am)
(2017-07-09 15:13:10 UTC, M 4.1 Western Xizang … 82.61’E – 34.41’N)Now it starts heading back to Japan…
2017-07-09 15:13:10 UTC, M 4.1 Western Xizang … 82.61’E – 34.41’N
Sunset on co-ordinates 34.53’E – 19.59’S Mozambique (5.6 epicentre June 24) … 15:14 UTC July 92017-07-15 16:35:22 UTC, M 4.4 India/Nepal border … 81.13’E – 28.30’N
Dusk on co-ordinates 34.53’E – 19:59’S Mozambique … 16:36 UTC July 15As stated previously in this thread, Dawn in Mozambique at 02:58 UTC June 24, coincided with solar noon on 136.100’E – 33.540’N Japan
Yesterday (July 15), I posted a list of times related to Burma, that I had sourced off the published quake lists. The number of 5+ events combined with a select period would suggest the probability of matching random times to a particular location, is at best high. Also, if finding a potential pre-seismic site was that simple, why are we trying so hard with the science ?. I have already posted a pre-seismic site in Burma… so here’s an example of my own “used” data for 162.660’E – 11.040’S Cristobal Trench, South Solomon’s
2017-03-10 06:22:19 UTC, M 5.2 Offshore Coquimbo, Chile … 72.05’W – 30.57’S
Sunset on 162.660’E – 11.040 Cristobal Trench … 06:23 UTC March 102017-03-26 19:14:37 UTC, M 5.2 Kempulauan Babar, Indonesia, … 129.89’E – 7.16’S
Sunrise on 162.660’E – 11.040’S Cristobal Trench … 19:14 UTC March 262017-04-08 07:08:01 UTC, M 5.5 Mindoro, Philippines … 120.92’E – 13.71’N
2017-04-08 07:09:25 UTC, M 5.9 Mindoro, Philippines … 120.89’E – 13.79’N
Sunset on 162.660’E – 11.040’S Cristobal Trench … 07:09 UTC April 8 (possible solar footprint)2017-04-14 18:03:23 UTC, M 5.3 Antofagasta, Chile … 68.76’W – 22.57’S
Dawn on 162.660’E – 11.040’S Cristobal Trench … 18:03 UTC April 142017-04-23 18:01:12 UTC, M 5.0 Java, Indonesia … 107.90’E – 7.85’S
Dawn on 162.660’E – 11.040’S Cristobal Trench … 18:02 UTC April 232017-05-07 08:08:33 UTC, M 5.0 Tonga … 172.64’W – 18.50’S
Dusk on 162.660’E – 11.040’S Cristobal Trench … 08:08 UTC May 7This last one was the deciding event at the time, Tonga being just round the corner from the Solomon’s. I then posted a forecast (Lester: May 7, 13:07 UTC), I changed the co-ordinates slightly to 163.670’E – 11.010’S, attempting to compensate for the terminator angle over a 14 day period. I continued to log times until an event actually occurred…
2017-05-08 08:08:20 UTC, M 5.4 Central Peru … 76.61’W – 8.05’S
Dusk on 162.660’E – 11.040’S Cristobal Trench … 08:08 UTC May 52017-05-09 19:15:50 UTC, M 5.4 Ryukyu Islands, Japan … 125.09’E – 25.73’N
Sunrise on 162.660’E – 11.040’S Cristobal Trench … 19:16 UTC May 9On May 24 at 11:05:21 UTC, a 5.8 occurred on 161.80’E – 10.01’S, in Su’upeine Bay, South Solomon’s. I got a hit which is posted in successful proclamations, but I only got it because of my 250 km margin. When I re-checked my data, I found I had missed one…
2017-05-20 01:06:14 UTC, M 5.9 Negros-Cebu Region, Philippines … 123.99’E – 9.38’N
Solar Noon on 162.660’E – 11.040’S Cristobal Trench … 01:06 UTC May 20 (another footprint)Experience with my method has shown there is nothing more reliable than a Solar Noon signature. On the basis of my solar footprints ( 🙂 ), and related changes in solar activity at the time, I forecast a 7+ on 162.660’E – 11.040’S (Lester: June 29, 9:55 pm). The event occurred on July 4 at 00:37:17 UTC… Unfortunately for me, it only reached mag 5.4.
The last 5+ seismic event in Cristobal Trench was a 5.3 seven months ago, on December 18 2016. There is no correlation with published times during January and February, nor is there any correlation since the Solar Noon signal on May 20, to the present !! I predicted a 6.9 on the Nepal/India border in 2011 using this method. Did I keep it to myself ? did I hell as like, I went to the most prominent scientist I could find and told him my hypothesis… “THAT’S” when he categorised me as delusional 🙂
So here are the facts, did I just demonstrate a simple detection method, or am I loosing my marbles… remember, be respectful to your elders 🙂
Score: 0115 ptslesterJuly 16, 2017 at 6:27 pm #2066Apologies, I missed one…
2017-07-15 22:40:17 UTC, M 5.1 West of Macquarie Island … 148.88’E – 58.81’S
Sunset on 148.88’E – 58.81’S Macquarie Island … 05:38 UTC July 15
Solar Noon on 97.286’E – 18.920’N Burma … 05:38 UTC July 15This is the first one I have come across in a 4 month search, that relates to a terminator zone and not an event time !
Score: 0115 pts115 pts37 ptsHookEchoJuly 17, 2017 at 8:28 pm #2079Lester, dude…how long are your watch periods on average? I have saw some predictions that are along the lines of “sometime between now and the next 30 days there will be an earthquake yada yada yada..” I am not stating you do that, so do not go on the defensive.
This thread needs to end, only because there are some good stuff getting buried in here. We can create a few posts pertaining to different subjects for our daily discussions, so it is easier to navigate.
I will be back..
Score: 037 pts115 pts11 pts115 ptslesterJuly 19, 2017 at 3:58 pm #2131I have compiled a sequence based on the recent 6.2 Russia event (prior to the 7.7), as always this is my interpretation. I am of the belief that if the data fits the picture… the picture must then show significance. I have done this several times now, so I will apologies before hand… what is one mans “yada” 🙂 is another mans hard sourced research, so please bear with me…
The 6.2 Nikol’Skoye event, and the 5.8 Solomon event of May 24 (list above in Cristobal Trench sequence) share a commonality with time. Nikol’Skoye occurred at 11:05:09 UTC July 17, the Solomon event occurred at 11:05:21 UTC May 24, as strange as it sounds, both times over the extent of this period, correlate with the morning border of Astronomical and Nautical twilight (11:05 UTC) on co-ordinates 157.107’E – 56.647’N Region of Sutwik Island, Alaska.
May 1 – The times of dawn and dusk on Sutwik Island were 10:43 UTC and 10:10 UTC respectively. Several hour later, dawn and dusk on Sutwik Island ceased to exist, the sun’s continual North lateral direction towards solstice had now brought it into it’s daylight period. There was in fact a sudden change in spectral frequency, which coincide with two 6.2 event East of this location on the same day.
2017-05-01 12:31:53 UTC, M 6.2 Southeastern Alaska … 136.66’W – 59.85’N
2012-05-01 14:18:17 UTC, M 6.2 Southeastern Alaska … 136.81’W – 59.77’NWhen I ran a short sequence on this location, I “surprisingly” found the following…
Sunrise on 136.66/81’W – 59.85/77’N Southeastern Alaska … 14:11 UTC May 1
Dusk on 97.286’E – 18.920’N Hpasawng, Burma … 14:11 UTC May 1
Sunrise on 122.330’W – 39.390’N North of San Francisco … 14:11 UTC May 1 (Lester:July 4, 7:25 pm)May 28 – There was again a spectral frequency change as the sun’s continuing North direction ceased the morning Astro/Naut zone on Sutwik Island. This “again” coincided with a 5.5 in the Andreanof Islands,Alaska at 07:07 UTC on the same day.
July 3 – A class M 1.3 solar flux event event occurred, peaking at 16:15 UTC. From the time this event occurred, I was embarrassingly checking for energy surges with my plasma globe experiment… it reacted on two longitudes, 168’E and 149’W. After further calculations, I found it was sunrise on 167.870’E – 54.170’N (58 km’s from 6.2 epicentre) and dusk on 148.740’W – 58.230’S Pacific-Antarctic ridge (Lester: July 2, 12:06 UTC), in my opinion the flux event left a solar footprint… I posted my forecast the day after (July 4).
July 16 – A spectral frequency change occurred on Sutwik Island, the sun was now heading South and in the process, morning Astro/Naut twilight returned to the region… it coincides with a CME strike at 05:45 UTC, related to the M 2.4 flux event on July 14
July 17 – The 6.2 Nikol’Skoye event occurs at 11:05:09 UTC, followed 12.5 hours later by the 7.7 event. Also at this time…
Dawn on 122.330’W – 39.390’N North of San Francisco … 11:06 UTC, July 17 (Lester: July 4, 7:25 pm)
Dawn on 116.115’W – 33.575’N Salton Sea Region … 11:06 UTC, July 17 (Lester: June 29, 6:36 pm)The following is the only sequence I could find for this location…
Sunrise on 168.58’E – 54.66’N Nikol’Skoye (6.2 epicentre) … 16:38 UTC July 17
Dusk on 34.53’E – 19.59’S Mozambique (5.6 epicentre, June 24) … 16:38 UTC July 17
Positional longitude of the moon 149.112’W (same longitude as Pacific-Antarctic above) … 16:38 UTC July 17Sunset on 168.58’E – 54.66’N Nikol’Skoye (6.2 epicentre) … 09:04 UTC July 18
Dusk on 153.20’E – 4.79’S New Ireland Region P.N.G. (6.4 epicentre, July 13) … 09:04 UTC July 18I’ll finish this with two further sequences related to July 17…
Sunrise on 157.107’W – 56.647’N Region of Sutwik Island … 14:04 UTC, July 17
Dusk on 70.716’E – 26.510’S Triple Junction, Indian Ocean … 14:04 UTC, July 172017-07-18 02:05:19 UTC, M 6.4 Near the Coast of Southern Peru … 73.66’W – 16.39’S
Dawn 10:07 UTC … Sunrise 11:25 UTC … Sunset 22:36 UTC… match the times…Sunset on 136.100’E – 33.540’N Southern Honshu Japan … 10:07 UTC, July 18
Dusk on 124.80’E – 11.11’N Layte, Philippines (6.5 epicentre July 6) … 11:25 UTC, July 18
Solar Noon on 157.107’W – 56.647’N Region of Sutwik Island … 22:36 UTC, July 18Addition…
2017-07-19 12:16:25 UTC, M 5.9 Mauritius – Reunion Region … 66.403’E – 17.441’S
Dawn 00:51 UTC July 19Astro/Naut twilight border on 157.107’W – 56.647’N Region of Sutwik Island … 12:17 UTC, July 19
Solar Noon on 168.90’E – 54.53’N Nikol’Skoye, Russia (7.7 epicentre, July 17)… 00:51 UTC, July 19I believe it is true what they say about the Seismologists, giving up on finding an answer to the earthquake problem. I have been pushing this kind of data for years, and I have not been able to find anybody who can, or is willing to analyse it. There is an inherent connection here with the terminator thresholds, which consists of an average 2 minute sunrise/sunset bands, and 1 minute dawn/dusk. bands. So every where on the planet will experience an average of 6 minutes of terminator time, in every 24 hour day period. How could a small Island in Alaska have connections with the Solomon’s, Russia, Peru and now Mauritius… and nobody notice ? Why is the same location North of San Francisco so easily implicated with two 6.2’s in Southeast Alaska, and the 6.2 in Russia, when there is only 6 minutes of terminator to play with ?
I have a canny knack to be able to correlate this kind of data and I am good at remembering times (Tayrance Allen – Alert started at 11:05 UTC July 18, same time as the 5.8 Solomon’s and 6.2 Russia events… I’m doomed to fail now 🙂 ). But I don’t fully understand the science behind it. Earth’s magnetic field must be able to retain memory of specific events, such as the M 1.3 Solar flare connection above shows. I would not be able to make these correlations with small Alaskan Islands etc, if I did not use this assumption as my starting point… I have now finished this sequence.
I was never very good with spreadsheets… so I apologise for the format of this post.
Score: 0115 ptslesterJuly 19, 2017 at 5:47 pm #2134I was just checking out Mauritius, and thought the following may be of interest…
May 8 – Dawn and dusk on 168.90’E – 54.53’N Nikol’Skoye (7.7 epicentre) were 13:08 UTC and 12:16 UTC respectively. Several hours later, dawn and dusk ceased to exist for the same reasons as Sutwik Island. This coincided with a 5.7, 5.9 and a 6.4 in the Andreanof islands on 178.58’W – 51.84’N, on the same day!
The last dusk threshold at this location was at 12:16 UTC as stated above… What time did the 5.9 Mauritius event occur ???
Score: 0115 ptslesterJuly 20, 2017 at 11:55 am #2141Yes Counselor!, a 5.9 will indeed leave it’s mark, and correlate with a near future event.
As I have shown above, Dawn on the 5.9 epicentre Mauritius event occurred at 00:51 UTC, July 19. If you check the USGS event list for yesterday (July 19), you will note that an inconsequential M 4.1 occurred at 23:54:16 UTC, at a distance of 110 km’s SW of Mapastepec, Mexico on co-ordinates 93.688’W – 14.800’N. On this day, it was Sunset at this location at 00:51 UTC. When the Mapastepec event occurred at 23:54:16 UTC… it was Dusk on 73.66’W – 16.39’S Near Coast of Southern Peru (6.4 epicentre, July 18).
So what triggered the earthquake, a sudden change in spectral frequency at a recent post seismic location… or stress ?
Score: 0115 ptslesterJuly 20, 2017 at 1:30 pm #2142Counselor,
A few familiar targets for you to chose from…Solar Noon on 66.403’E – 17.441’S Mauritius (5.9 epicentre) … 07:42 UTC, July 19
Sunset on 173’W – 51’N Atka Basin, Andreanof Islands … 07:42 UTC, July 19
Sunset on 155’E – 5.50’S North end of Bougainville Island … 07:42 UTC, July 19
Sunrise on 39.50’W – 33’N Northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge … 07:42 UTC, July 19
Sunrise on 13.530’W – 236.880’S Southern Mid-Atlantic Ridge (Lester:July 4 7:25 pm) … 07:42 UTC, July 19
Dawn on 25’W – 57.50’S South Sandwich Islands … 07:42 UTC, July 19
Dusk on 126’W – 50’N Vancouver Island, Canada … 07:42 UTC, July 19
Dusk on 122.75’W – 50.50’N British Colombia, Canada … 07:42 UTC, July 19
(Dawn and Dusk on this location in British Colombia, returned to normal on July 16… day of the CME impact!)If you were to forecast these locations over 20 days, it would be interesting to see how many get a hit !!
Score: 0115 pts11 ptsCounselorJuly 20, 2017 at 1:39 pm #2144If I had to think of the diurnal nature of teluric current, then are you leaning in the direction of stress? It would be another piece of a puzzle for a layman like me to understand how the recent M7+ could come around after a recent 6+ (not necessarily you and the other 0bservers, but many outside this community understand quakes as relieving the “stress”. I will save my next series of questions because, sadly, I have been slow to catch the trend you have been seeing until just now.
Score: 0115 ptslesterJuly 20, 2017 at 3:04 pm #2145No Counselor… without confusing the issue for you, you are correct in your assumption. The 7.7 was an aftershock and stress related, a right lateral shift occurred on the plate boundary as a result of the 6.2. What I am proposing above is a possible trigger theory pertaining to the original 6.2 event. Stress is the symptom of an earthquake, without it they would not occur. But my argument is why can I relate the terminator thresholds so easily to seismic events in the method I have shown, if there was no purpose in nature to do so. I have shown you above, the sun was on the “exact longitude of a 7.7 which occurred on the 17th, and a 5.9 occurs at that moment in Mauritius. Why did it not occur 5 or 10 minutes before or after it passed this longitude ?. because there is an inherent connection to spectral energy. I believe specific locations are being highlighted by cyclonic actions within the inner mantle, targeted by high mag quakes and solar flux events… and executed by electromagnetic connection derived from combination.
Most forecasters here are predicting whole country’s, or 5000 miles of coastline etc, my own forecasts are always within 310 radial miles. The list I have posted above is an example of how I zero in on specific locations using the terminator. It is also an example of what I explained to you about getting ahead of the sequence… nothing has happened at these locations yet! I am old school, and I’m having trouble fitting in with Blot Echo methods, because to save lives you have to get close to the target. If I started predicting country’s instead of points… I don’t think I would be very welcome here 🙂
Score: 011 ptsCounselorJuly 20, 2017 at 7:41 pm #2146No worries Lester. What if we begin linking images from either windytv or nullschool with a pressure map at solar noon?
https://www.windy.com/?33.880,-118.275,5
And the time/date map
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/sunearth.html
Perhaps we can start using some visuals together and couple a few ideas together? The 3 of us? Or, whomever else is reading this thread? You and Hook got so close to that M7 using your skill sets that I am convinced your approaches are linked albeit from different angles.
I read you post around 1430 UTC today, see link below for what I took a screenshot of:
https://photos.app.goo.gl/qqDkWyFmgTqz0bSH2I forgot to screenshot quakewatch but I think we should add this too. I have tried looking for archived satellite weather images with no luck, so forgive me if you have something. At that moment you find a “footprint” lets snapshot either a windy/nullschool image, and quakewatch. My idea is that we can narrow this down some more. I think it’s hard to ignore blot echoes because of the data related to it. I have read the material that Hook has posted, as well as the Davidson (et al) studies, and feel there is some common ground with what you see.
If I am tracking anything about what you are saying, next solar noon has the sun over the prime meridian (the moon relatively close in line) some dawn dusk areas in that image have blot echoes (Ryukyu Japan, Antofagasta Chile, Guatemala) Could we see a M4+ pop at Tristan Da Cunha? Bouvet Island, Saint Helena, in Morocco/Algeria along Atlas Mountains, near Iceland? If there were a pop, those dawn dusk areas with a blot echo have a compounded factor as a potential hit.
What do you guys think?
Score: 0115 ptslesterJuly 20, 2017 at 11:03 pm #2151Counselor,
This is what I was hoping we would achieve some day… a team effort. This is the very thing I told Hook at the beginning of the discussion thread. There are too many factors involved for one person to analyse all the data, and come to a successful determination of a seismic occurrence every time. If you have been following my progress, you will see that I have logged successful hits with: Published quake lists, Dodgy satellite feeds, solar flares and using something as insignificant as a plasma globe. Some where in this there is a common denominator, leading to a scientific explanation. The Blot Echo is the key to this because it instigates the action from the mantle. The terminator is the attraction that connects A to B like wiring on a circuit board. The sun is putting power into this circuit board with solar flux events, CME’s and solar wind from coronal holes. Then there’s the moon, what part does gravity play in this, I could not tell you because I have not been able to find a gravitational link with my hypothesis. However, I studied Hook’s statistics on Japan, Nearly all 7+ events occurred pre – post 5 days full moon. The common denominator is the phase… the moon has a terminator too !!. Obviously, this will alter angle in relation to the sun, but it also has gravity anomalies… is there some kind of circuit board at work here too ?.It would be nice to give it a shot if Hook is in agreement, he knows the science and has the skill set to do this… I’m just good at correlating data.
Score: 011 ptsCounselorJuly 20, 2017 at 11:05 pm #2152BTW attu station Alaska just popped a 4.3 at the same UTC time as the Turkey 6+ fired off. The sun was over Hawaii, but that island chain is connected to a long mountain chain that dog legs at the ocean floor in the direction of attu station. Maybe something to look at later?
Score: 0115 ptslesterJuly 21, 2017 at 12:41 am #2154Counselor,
It’s late here, so I haven’t given this my full attention, but here’s a quick taste of how this works…2017-07-20 22:31:11 UTC M 6.7 SSE of Bodrum, Turkey … 27.458’E – 36.949’N
Dawn 01:22 UTC … Dusk 19:14 UTCSunset on 149.112’W – 58.848’S Pacific Antarctic Ridge (Lester: July 2, 12:06 am) … 01:22 UTC, July 20
Sunrise on 169.288’E – 17.630’S Vale Trough, Vanuatu … 19:14 UTC, July 20I have combined data from the solar noon Mauritius list, with the Turkey event and found a correlation… Vanuatu! So you now have a target, all you need to do now is note weather it is Dawn/Dusk Sunrise/Sunset on this point in Vanuatu when further 5+ events occur… the more hits it gets, the more accurate the radius will become.
This one is on me,so I wish you luck… you made my day 🙂
Score: 011 ptsCounselorJuly 21, 2017 at 12:46 am #2155And, the center line of the dark area at the time 2231 UTC passed over the space near the epicenter of the turkey quake. Not sure if that is just coincidence today, but I would agree then with idea of the moon having a terminator too. If we hear about planetary bodies like Jupiter and Saturn producing their own types of energies that can boost/cancel out the effects of the sun (Gaussian wave pattern connectin info that I read) during grand conjunctions), then it stands to reason the moon could do this too. I remember a picture I need to find that showed meteor strikes on the moon, and the pattern look like there was an equatorial region. electromagnetic effects at play there, as well as gravity. However, let’s start with a few basic add-ons to the existing tools. It could only help, even if it might be at the expense of ruling out some things along the way.
Score: 0115 ptslesterJuly 21, 2017 at 11:00 am #21642017-07-21 08:59:08 UTC, M 5.5 ESE of Port-Vila, Vanuatu (Vale Trough) … 169.134’E – 18.040’S
Epicentre 28 miles SSW of co-ordinates posted above…
Sorry Counselor… looks like you may have missed your opportunity this time round, would you like me to find you another one ?
Official stats say 2 people died in Turkey yesterday… it could just as easily have been 2000 !!
Score: 011 ptsCounselorJuly 21, 2017 at 1:24 pm #2167Lester, that would be awesome. I just woke up and saw the quake that hit there. Almost forecasted it after you shared the spot. Looked at the TEC map at Trimble, Hook, and it looked like there was a little higher than average activity in the Islannd chain off the eastern area of PNG/vanuatu, but didn’t think it was going pop that soon. What did you see in that area? 0859 UTC July 21? One of the reasons I almost posted was that new moon influence because the posted time I think is when the sun had already set. Off to work in a few minutes. So, I will try to check in when I can.
Score: 0115 ptslesterJuly 21, 2017 at 10:49 pm #2179Lets try again Counselor… match the times !
2017-07-21 08:59:07 UTC M 5.5 Vale Trough, Vanuatu … 169.134’E – 18.040’S
Sunset on 168.90’E – 54.66’N Nikol’Skoye (7.7 epicentre) … 08:59 UTC, July 21 !!
…………………………………………………………..Sunset on 168.90’E – 54.66’N Nikol’Skoye (7.7 epicentre) … 08:59 UTC, July 21
Sunrise on 34.53’E – 19.59’S Mozambique (5.4 epicentre, June 24) … 04:17 UTC July 21
Solar Noon on 66.403’E – 17.441’S Mauritius (5.9 epicentre) … 07:42 UTC, July 21Dawn on 123.365’W – 51.100’N British Colombia … 08:59 UTC, July 21
Sunset on ,,,,,,, – ,,,,,,,, British Colombia … 04:17 UTC, July 21
Dusk on ,,,,,,,, – ,,,,,,,, British Colombia … 07:42 UTC, July 21
…………………………………………………………….2017-07-21 08:59:07 UTC M 5.5 Vale Trough, Vanuatu ,,,,,,,, – ,,,,,,,,,
Dawn on 66.403’E – 17.441’S Mauritius ,,,,,,,,, … 00:49 UTC, July 21
Sunrise on 24.520’W – 59.770’S South Sandwich Islands … 10:20 UTC, July 21Dusk on 71.865’W – 19.563’N South of Fort Liberty, Haiti … 08:59 UTC, July 21
Dawn on ,,,,,,,, – ,,,,,,,, ,,,,, ,, ,,,, ,,,,,,, Haiti … 00:49 UTC, July 21
Sunrise on ,,,,, – ,,,,,,,, ,,,,, ,, ,,,, ,,,,,,, Haiti … 10:20 UTC, July 21
……………………………………………………………Dusk on 24.520’W – 59.770’S South Sandwich Islands … 19:51 UTC, July 21
Sunrise on 155.030’E – 4.900’S Bougainville, P.N.G. … 19:51 UTC, July 21
Dusk on ,,,,,,,,,,,, – ,,,,,,, Bougainville, P.N.G. … 08:59 UTC, July 21You have 3 locations here, all connected to the 7.7 Nikol’Skoye event by time 08:59 UTC. Dusk and Dawn recently returned to this location in British Colombia on the 19th… possible spectral influence perhaps! However 90 years of historical records I sourced do not seem to indicate any Seismic history. Haiti definitely has history, my own calculations say something is there, but not enough to tempt me into forecasting just yet… check the models and see what you think !. I believe Bougainville is a definite target, it has just been centred by 5+ quakes in Vanuatu and New Guinea. The models may indicate activity in the next few days, but I still regard this data as a footprint… I always forecast 20 days on footprints!
Your decision Counselor… good luck 🙂
Score: 0 -
|
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.