-
15 ptsCanyonratApril 5, 2020 at 10:04 pm #8617
Hello everyone,
(I am using words that will translate better for international readers. For English speakers my vocabulary will sound awkward.)
Thank you for reading this post.
My request is please take time to examine western half of the USA for potential M 6.5+ activity. West of the Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean.
Why do I ask for this help? I am confused by the unusually high count of weak earthquakes (M 0.0 – 2.4) spreading across the western half of the USA with consideration being given to the recent stronger (M 4.9+) 7 quakes that struck over the last 20 days. Today’s Blot Echo Risk Map shows high risk west coast Oregon. I would like a “second opinion”.
I have about 8 months forecasting experience with about 50% success. I focus my forecasts to what I observe in my area, which is west coast and inland North America. My experience involves forecasting mostly M 4.5 to 6.0. I do not have experience forecasting any seismic events M 6.5 or larger.
I did make a statement on 2020-03-04 (March 4) on my Facebook to watch for larger seismic events occurring east of California in unexpected locations. We have experienced 3 unexpected events since then. A fourth event should occur according to my forecast, maybe a fifth, east of California. I currently have a forecast for moderate M 5.0 +/- in 3 or 4 locations.
My guess or my feelings or my intuition… tell me something much larger is about to happen, but I can not determine strength, when, or location (from the Pacific coast all the way inland). What I am not determining is if something larger, will occur, or will not occur. I have been thinking about this for several days.
I will not accept any credit for any assistance provided but I will give any credit to you.
I will take any help you offer.
Mark in California, be safe.
Score: 0115 ptslesterApril 6, 2020 at 1:53 am #8620Bit of a late post for me in the UK, but ACE made significant contact at exactly 20:00 UTC 5th April. This placed the sun on longitude 119’23’W, which gives a starting point in Ventura, California, and then North through Nevada. As I mentioned before, my method is regarded as unconventional, but I nearly bagged a 7.5 in Russia with it… and it did get me a “credible” hit on Mt Ebeko volcano lol.
ACE is a satellite designed to monitor the sun… but only the scientists using it, believe it is monitoring the sun !!!
Score: 0115 ptslesterApril 6, 2020 at 2:22 pm #8624I checked ACE and S.C. data for the last 7 days, combined the results, and it shows influential region between 35’20’N / 34’20’N – 119’27’W. This relates to a region between Ventura, California and Buttonwillow, West of Bakersfield. Nearest ephemeral contact is Anza, Southern California. Without this contact, or more significant data… my base line estimate would be mag 4+. If others had data that fits this picture, estimate would increase accordingly… sorry, all I can contribute at present.
As a side note, two Phi contacts in ACE data today at 13:23 UTC – 13:48 UTC… anybody see these ?. The times coincide with SLT threshold, followed by sunrise on coordinates 122’45’W – 38’05’N San Francisco Bay area… possible 3+ in the next 5 days !
Score: 015 ptsCanyonratApril 6, 2020 at 8:46 pm #8628Lester, thank you for your data.
Counselor is watching M 6+ potential for a 250KM/155mls radius around Tehachapi, CA ( 35° 7’53.08″N 118°26’56.53″W ) April 4 to April 7. Which includes all of S. California and all of our watch areas. He feels the Garlock Fault will be the cause.
T. Allen is watching California – 500km/312mls radius from Tom’s Place ( 37°33’37.76″N 118°40’52.03″W ): 5.0 – 6.0 April 6th, 2020 until April 11th, 2020. Which includes 90% of California and Nevada and all of our watch areas.
I (Canyonrat) am watching S. California 4.7 to 5.7 April 5 to April 19 An oblong shape from Avila Beach California on a NE line to Bishop California, 49km/30miles east or west of that connecting line. With this two points it creates a long narrow line which is 100km/62mls north of you northern point.
Lester’s data indicates M 4+ April 6 to April 13 from 34°20’0.14″N 119°26’58.73″W north to 35°19’60.00″N 119°26’60.00″W.
All of these watch areas overlap…interesting?!
I posted on Counselor’s forecast that I to think that soon the Garlock Fault will release larger energy, but I think first we will see some M 5.0ish energy strike at it’s southern end where it intersects with the San Andreas Fault near the town of Frazier Park California ( 34°48’51.84″N 118°53’4.51″W ) or westward from this point.
The Official Seismologists also agree the Garlock could release larger energy: https://www.lamag.com/citythinkblog/garlock-fault-ridgecrest-earthquake/
And your area (Lester) is just west of the end of the Garlock Fault. Maybe we all will be correct. First 5.0 energy in Lester’s area, then follow-up larger energy strikes the Garlock Fault.
I would also allow him an additional few days perhaps until April 14th for his window. California is sleepy and SLOW with movement of energy. Just look at the Ridge Crest from July 2019 M 7.1. The standing record for after shocks had been just over 3,000. Ridge Crest still can not move the energy along even with (my low end guess) 300,000 after shocks! Ridge Crest already had experienced 80,000 aftershocks in just the first 20 days.
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2019-07-22/ridgecrest-earthquakes-now-total-80-000
Score: 015 ptsCanyonratApril 6, 2020 at 11:44 pm #8630Just watched Dutchsince on youtube 2020-04-06 @ 6am UTC. He issued a warning for M 5.0 activity from Ventura California up to Ridge Crest California from today April 6 to April 13. He also has a few days remaining on his M 5.0 activity for offshore near Eureka California.
Score: 015 ptsCanyonratApril 7, 2020 at 1:31 am #8634Lester, your San Francisco Bay area… possible 3+ in the next 5 days. Well thought. Your location is 8km/5mls east of the San Andreas Fault and Point Reyes the area where the San Francisco 1906 quake occurred. Point Reyes was on my last watch…a miss, but perhaps my miss will only on the time (by a few days).
Score: 0115 ptslesterApril 7, 2020 at 9:55 pm #8641The M 5.2 Southeast of Grenada at 03:26:52 UTC today, may produce a positive or negative result, for prospects of notable seismic activity occurring in the region of Ventura, California !. All now depends on weather repercussions occur within the next few days, from usual suspects like 150’E New Britain… Kushiro canyon region, Hokkaido… or Mindanao, Philippines. If activity occurs at these locations, then Ventura, CA is still in the loop !
My first post above relates to Significant ACE contact at 20:00 UTC 5th April, http://www.timeanddate.com “Moon Light World Map”… moonrise on Windward Islands !. Also moonset on Kyushu, Japan, which had a 4.1 event at 17:53:30 UTC today. Grenada and Kyushu, both in contact on the 5th, both occurred on the 7th !
Score: 0115 ptslesterApril 8, 2020 at 9:41 pm #8645Please continue if you have anything for us today Mark ? … don’t let my posts impede anyone from staying the course !
Significant ACE aspect change from 20:06 UTC to 20:50 UTC 8th April. At 20:06 UTC, the ATB threshold was located on Yamdena Island, Banda Sea region (good for me !), and the Sun was located on longitude 121’05’W !. At 20:50 UTC, it was moonset in both Kashiro, Hokkaido and 150’E New Britain P.N.G. … I believe Tayrence has P.N.G. covered. Comparing previous posts above, now would be a good time for Pi_Seas to move on Japan again !!
Score: 0115 pts15 ptsCanyonratApril 9, 2020 at 3:42 am #8648Lester, thank you for the info. I will check it out in a few hours. (Again, my communication is for better translation for international viewers/forecasters and anyone new to this subject matter.)
What I was noticing for California, but also other areas on the Earth, will be the ocean tides. In California the high/high tide at around 12:05am (midnight) (7:05am UTC) Thursday the 9th followed by the low/low tide around 6:30am PST (1:30pm UTC), along with the Super Moon (perigee or closest point) and is also a Full Moon and should the KP Index reach 3 or 4, and the effects of the coronal hole hit earth at the same time, then California, plus other areas, should see some larger and in expected areas strike between 3:00am PST (10:00am UTC) and 9:00am PST (4:00pm UTC) Thursday March 9th 2020.
Keep alert..one eye open for this period and possible other periods in the next 2 or 3 days for these convergences.
Score: 015 ptsCanyonratApril 9, 2020 at 4:19 am #8649The most important point…look at the high/high tide near your forecast area, then add 3 hours, that would be the start of a watch window, should KP and Coronal influence also fit in that six hour window. But also be aware the next 24 hour cycle could be it. (And yes I am thinking through/about a lunar cycle for some of these forecasts.) We all might look at each-other’s forecasts in tidal and lunar cycles, not to give credit but to learn from and discuss.
Score: 0115 ptslesterApril 10, 2020 at 7:41 pm #8658An M 5.1 occurred in Mindanao, Philippines at 18:45:49 UTC. The ATB threshold (Astronomical Twilight Begins) was located on 150’E New Britain P.N.G. at this time. So things are looking up for Ventura, CA, because events are happening within the predicted family circle… timing depends on weather Ventura is a brother or a cousin !!
for Marco… moon was located on longitude 116’23’E at the time of this event… Lombok Island !!
Score: 015 ptsCanyonratApril 10, 2020 at 8:14 pm #8660Lester, thank you for you guidance. Today it looks like seismic activity in N. America has stepped up M .5 in strength over the last few days AND the frequency or number of smaller under M 2.5 activity has increased dramatically. Could be the beginning of a new wave. So we keep watching grandpa snore. ZZZ LOL
Score: 0115 pts
7 ptsNomadicFredApril 12, 2020 at 8:37 am #8684Well from my little world i would put the Long Valley Caldera on the list of things to look at, i am thinking any changes in flow patterns/density between there and lets say somewhere around Salt Lake City. there is a lot that i dont understand, but ill toss that into the pot.
Fred
Score: 015 ptsCanyonratApril 12, 2020 at 7:40 pm #8686Nomadic Fred, I’m travelling so no computer. I too was thinking the half way point between the 5.2 at Mono Lake and Ridge Crest California. I knew for certain that my forecast point at Bishop California just 50 miles from the 5.2 if it was going to experience any activity it would be south of Bishop.
I just watched Dutchsince’s 4/11 broadcast and he also is thinking more activity near Ridge Crest and larger activity in Colorado. I have an Alert Forevast for SE central Colorado. Dutch is also getting nervous about the Juan Dr Fuca Plate offshore from the state’s of Washington and Oregon. I’m going to start watching that area closely and continue to watch Lake Mead/Hoover Dam area.
Next I’m gonna order Ben’s new book and study up on electro quakes to add to my Dutch method of observational forecasting with a spice of “huntch/feeling/intuition”-to focus center points. I think Ben sent a hint to us forecasters in today’s 4/12 broadcast to up our forecasting game.
Mark
Score: 0115 ptslesterApril 12, 2020 at 10:54 pm #8688Isn’t it amazing that during this last week, there have been four forecasters including myself, using different methods, posting factual data and strategic speculation… and we still missed a 5.2 in Bodie, California !. Well actually, that’s not entirely true is it !… Tayrance was there. I watched “Band of Brothers” on TV… thought it was a true story !!
Good to see you here Fred, the more coverage we get in Western US regions, greater the chance that we might “officially” hit something.
Since my post of 7th April, in this thread that Mark has initiated. There have been 5+ events in Mindanao, Philippines, New Britain P.N.G. and two 4.5’s in Hokkaido. Though I think Hokkaido is being slow off the mark, and may produce a 5+ event in the next few days. Things appear to be running true to form, but there is still no hint of activity in the region of Ventura, California. However, I did note a significant S.C. contact today (12th) at 06:57:47 UTC. It was Moonrise on the 101 Ventura freeway on longitude 119’24’W at this time… when the M 6.1 occurred this morning (my time) North of Amsterdam Island, Indian Ocean !. I don’t use stress transfer in my method, but considering all the inland activity that has occurred recently. I believe we are going to start seeing felt events in Los Angeles this coming week, because it shares the same field line as Bodie, CA. And if this occurs, focus will then be on costal regions like Ventura !.
I also bring attention here to the fact that ACE has recorded another “significant” aspect change again, at exactly 20:00 UTC today. At this time, the sun was located on longitude 119’51’W. I say again because my post of 6th April in this thread, relates to a similarly significant contact at 20:00 UTC on this day… hence the call on Ventura. However, I compared solar / lunar thresholds on my model, related to these stated dates. And the only “usual suspect” location I mentioned on 7th April, that has not deviated from the picture, is New Britain P.N.G. A sunrise time of 20:00 UTC remains consistent between dates 5th – 14th April on coordinates 150’26’E – 6’34’S off coast of Gasmata, New Britain P.N.G. No need to guess where I am going when I sign off here !! … two 5+ events in this region today, means it has potential for a 6+. The actual aspect change at 20:00 UTC today was first instigated by a drop in Phi level at 19:54 UTC. This placed the sun on longitude 118’21’W, could this be Los Angeles I wonder… with respect to my method of course !.
Score: 015 ptsCanyonratApril 14, 2020 at 3:22 am #8692Hello everyone. I’m back home. I was eyeing the area where the 5.2 at Bodie California struck. I said I thought it would strike near Bishop California, and was certain my narrow forecast area was good, so I placed a tight ranged area on the forceast. Southern California – 4.7 to 5.7 April 5 to April 19 An oblong shape from Avila Beach California on a NE line to Bishop California, 49km/30miles east or west of that connecting line. My gut says closer to Bishop, but data disagrees. So the M 5.2 struck, which is what I was exactly watching for, in my time window, but located out side my watch area by 32km/20mls. It struck 81km/50mls from Bishop California which was a center point of my watch area. My forecast is a miss, but notable non-the-less. I’m just pushing myself on tight forecast areas so that eventually these forecasts will be useful and we can then contact emergency authorities in our forecast areas to get prepared.
Based on this new activity I will be making a forecast. And extending one or two that expired, but I have been out of town and away from my computer since Saturday the 11th morning just before the 5.2 struck, otherwise I would have extended a few hours after it struck.
On a side note. My style of forecasting should be called “Observational Forecasting” because I look at prior quakes to forecast the next quakes; I also call it the “Dutch Method” since he came up with it and has posted a how to video.
Let’s bring in Mars and Dr. Richard Hoagland. And yes his ideas are controversial, but there certainly must be some gold among the sand of his thoughts. This is a new idea and I will be suspiciously observing for. Dr. Hoagland identified the possibility that there might be some mathematical observations regarding planetary geometry. This geometry appears to explain why we see energy events in specific areas on a planet. One thing he pointed out was the hexagon shape of clouds at the polar regions of planets in our solar system. I have been using EQ3D to help forecast, but it places circles around earthquake events…perhaps placing hexagons would prove more useful???…just thinking. So I will go back and look at some prior events to see if there are any noticeable/observable correlations. Being away from my computer made me start thinking what can I forecast? How? What other tools could I use? And the hexagon enetred my thoughts.
Forecasts in the next few hours.
Look for 4.0+ activity off shore on the southern half of the Juan de Fuca next 48 hours. This quake activity is used as a forecast tool/data-point for an on land forecast where all the people live. Remember, forecasting is to help all the people.
Score: 0115 ptslesterApril 15, 2020 at 12:43 am #8701A couple of corresponding observations… The VAAC in Darwin reported Mt Kerinci volcano in south Sumatra, erupted today at 02:47 UTC. Also of interest to me, was the M 5.0 kuril islands event, also of today at 02:46:24 UTC… this was a hit in my S.C. ALERT forecast. Both got my attention because they occurred during the same minute of time… not unheard of, but is rare for an eruption to coincide with earthquakes in the 5.0 range. It also got my attention because at 02:47 UTC, it was sunset on coordinates 122’45’W – 38’05’N San Francisco bay area… same coordinates I posted on 6th April in this thread. Other volcanic news reported today (14th) related to an explosion from Mt Sakurajima volcano in Kyushu, Japan at 18:49 UTC… this time coincided with moonset in Anza, Southern California.
Don’t know weather this will result in actual activity occurring, but if Mt Ebeko volcano was “assumed” to have been triggered by Threshold contact with Mt Anak Krakatau volcano (as per my method). And then this proceeds to erupt 2 weeks later, I would still speculate a possible 3+ is on the way in San Francisco, and possibly advise preparation for any unsecured crockery… because my magnitude estimates have never been very reliable !
Score: 0115 ptslesterApril 15, 2020 at 1:17 am #8702This may also be an interesting point which has just come to my attention. At 02:47 UTC 14th April (as mentioned above) the ATB threshold was located on Mt Stromboli volcano in Italy… 02:47 UTC being eruption time of Mt Kerinci volcano. At 00:35 UTC 15th April, the VAAC in Tokyo reported an eruption from Mt Klyuchevskoy in Kamchatka… the RLT threshold was located om Mt Stromboli at this time !
On 1st April at 11:03 UTC, it was sunset on Mt Anak Krakatau volcano, and the sun was located on longitude 15’11’E, which corresponds to solar noon (high noon) on Mt Stromboli volcano. This was the last correlation between these volcanoes before the sun changed position to correlate with Mt Etna volcano in Sicily. Two ephemeral period occurred on this day, First Quarter moon phase between times 11:46 UTC – 12:14 UTC. And the moon was also placed on its furthest Northern latitude for this month at 23’42’N… and remained at this latitude between times 05:42:03 UTC – 12:43:53 UTC. This of course encompassed the Krakatau / Stromboli correlation, and First quarter moon phase.
I once predicted an eruption of Mt Etna volcano using this strategy… because an earthquake had occurred in San Francisco 4 days earlier !!
Score: 015 ptsCanyonratApril 15, 2020 at 6:53 pm #8711Lester, thank you. If I understand your methodology, I should be watching for an eruption (would a 5.0+ quake at the volcano suffice?) at Mnt Ebeko between now and April 28, then look strongly at the San Francisco area for 3.0+.
On a side note. I’m getting really nervous with the Juan de Fuca being so quiet as the Western USA is covered with a shocking amount of quake activity. Even Dutch said on his last broadcast a few days ago, “I am really starting to freak out with no energy being released at the Juan de Fuca and the state of Colorado.”
For quick referencing:
Mnt. Ebiko 50°39’58.25″N 156° 1’4.86″E
https://ds.data.jma.go.jp/svd/vaac/data/index.htmlJuan de Fuca Plate 45°46’53.18″N 130° 4’7.15″W
Score: 0115 ptslesterApril 15, 2020 at 9:41 pm #8712You have the right thinking, but the wrong elements. Best way to describe this is to load http://www.timeanddate.com … select the Sun & Moon in the header … select Day and Night Map from the drop down menu … then input 02:48 UTC 15th April in the time and date boxes. What you should be looking at now is the sunset threshold in the Santa Rosa area of San Francisco… and the beginning of astronomical twilight (border between night and day) on Mt Stromboli volcano, which is just off the north coast of Sicily, with respect to the map.
If you then input 04:22 UTC, you should now see that it is sunrise on Mt Stromboli volcano, and it is the end of astronomical twilight ( day to night) in san Francisco. The solar thresholds are equally matched in two different places, on opposite sides of the world. Within the earth, electromagnetic current is being produced by the dynamo affect within the core. Volcanoes are pin holes in the earth’s surface, and an easy access point for this energy to exist. With reference to the map, if one of the solar / lunar thresholds (sunrise / sunset etc) made contact with one of these energy points (volcanoes) a positive / negative reaction occurs (like two opposing magnets, and energy is transferred from one point to another like a short circuit, or invisible lightning for instance… kind of like placing your finger on a plasma globe !
Volcanic activity is self propagating in this way, and the same can be said for earthquakes… I only use one method and it works on two different scientific doctrines. This energy transfer mostly works via parallel correlation, meaning source may be connected to the ATB threshold for example, but when it makes contact with a possible target, it has transferred to the sunset threshold. But in this case, there is a double correlation because Sunset to ATE in San Francisco (2 contacts) equally matches ATB to sunrise on Mt Stromboli volcano. This only happens twice a year as the threshold angles change due to the sun’s motion North and south relative to earth (summer / winter ). and at each occurrence, correlation only occurs for one or two days. If the correlation happens to line up with an active volcano, then you have to consider where the target could be.
Referring to the map at 02:48 UTC, you can follow the ATB threshold from Mt Stromboli volcano heading North. First tectonic boundary you would come to, would be the Reykjanes Ridge region south of Iceland. this region does have notable events, but they are infrequent compared to other locations… and it usually needs more that a volcanic correlation to awaken it (strong structure). At the pole, influence is transferred to the sunset threshold, follow this south and the next tectonic boundary is the San Andreas Fault line. After this it disappears into the Pacific, and there is nothing out here. So its last stop before hitting the water was San Francisco !
There are many earthquakes along the San Andreas Fault, therefore it is already weakened (weak structure). If my theory is correct, influence from Mt Stromboli volcano, with bypass Reykjanes ridge and go for the weakest point, and in this scenario, it may have its sights on San Francisco. If there is an outcome, it will likely be in the 3.5 – 4.5 range. If San Francisco correlated to a post seismic 6.5 – 7.5 epicentre in the same manner, then I would be concerned that something greater than 4.5 could be a possibility. But the odds of this occurring are so great, that I doubt I will be around when this happens 🙂
Would be an interesting project to find locations of significant events and volcanic eruptions, two months prior to the great San Francisco earthquake of 1906 ! This may sound like a load of gobbldy gook to most people… but I do hit the target sometimes lol
The current threat to San Francisco as per my methodology is Mt Stromboli volcano. Hope you could follow this… I can elaborate more if required.
As a side note – I am formulating a forecast for the Aleutian islands, just west of Unimak Island. If you input 13:34 UTC 15th April in the map, the ATE threshold is located on this point… but notice it is also sunrise in San Francisco. I have not seen any corelating data yet in this regard… but you can see how A “naturally” connects to B !
Score: 0115 ptslesterApril 16, 2020 at 12:59 am #8714I got a 5.3 hit in New Britain P.N.G., following the theory I posted on 12th April above. This event was triggered from Puerto Rico, specifically in the local of the M 6.4 epicentre of 7th Jan… and currently, the most seismically active location on the planet. Similarly to active volcanoes, it is a constant energy source within a few kilometres of the surface. This 5.3 New Britain occurred at 22:42:20 UTC… it was sunset in Puerto Rico at this time. This epicentre has been triggering low mag 5’s and some Very significant 6’s since its birth. Some of the more recent ones include…
22nd March 22:38:04 UTC – M 6.1 Central East pacific Rise = Sunset
30th March 09:09:05 UTC – M 5.6 Columbia-Ecuador Border region = ATB
31st March 23:52:31 UTC – M 6.5 Southern Idaho, USA = ATEAs mentioned in my post of 12th April above, New Britain forecast was derived from two ACE contacts at 20:00 UTC, 7 days apart. If I used the ACE satellite data to determine this location. Then it seems ironic that specifically designed satellites have been launched in recent years to hunt for earthquakes, when this old timer has been up there for two decades… sending back data, that I now use to hunt for pre seismic earthquakes and pre volcanic eruptions. There is also a time delay in my theory, that alternates with orbital positioning during the course of a year. I am not able to work this out myself, and needs modelling on a computer. But it is the reason I nearly always predict with 300 km radius… it is to allow for 8.3 minutes of earths rotation.
Check the Quake times above, in the T & D Day and Night Map !
Score: 0115 ptslesterApril 16, 2020 at 1:26 am #8715Another useful tool I use… if you search flux.phys.uit.no/Last24 … open web page “Real Time Magnetogram, 24 hour plot” … in the listings, select TROMSO in the left column. The displayed graph will show a significant aspect change occurring at 21:00 UTC 15th April. The moon was located on longitude 150’39’E New Britain P.N.G. at this time. An aspect change of this format, usually means something more substantial is coming… as per my methodology of course !
Score: 015 ptsCanyonratApril 16, 2020 at 8:03 am #8716Lester, wow, I actually “get it”. The Tesla Electric globe description was the key for me. I also like your thinking of going back in time, looking at an event and then looking over to determine correlation. We just need a few young college students to pluck through the data…LOL I have been considering going back and looking at old mega quakes to see what observational forecasting tells about precursors.
I keep thinking we need to combine forecasting methods. So your method would indicate to look at a location. The my method would look to see if enough seismic pressure is in the surrounding area.
Right now there is a boat load of seismic pressure pushing north to south in California and west to east through California. We are only seeing the west to east energy at this time and it has jumped in equally spaced distances from the coast with San Francisco as my center point. Google Earth it and draw measurement circles and it is startling.
320km/200mls (5.2 Mono Lake/Bodie California AND the southern eastern most point of the Juan de Fuca)
640km/400mls (the weird 3.7 in Nevada and weird because there are no know quakes in 100 miles of it (SEE DETAILS BELOW) and it too crosses the east most inner point of the Juan de Fuca zig-zag plate boundary)
960km/600mls (5.7 Salt Lake City AND 6.5 Idaho AND the western most point of the Juan de Fuca zig-zag plate boundary)
1280km/800mls (nothing yet, but why I have my forecast for central south east Colorado, and it crosses very close to the northern most point of the Juan de Fuca and very close the the 5.0 that struck west Texas)
This would be a movie moment were the scientist rips paper from the printer, starts drawing circles on the USA map, and says, “my God!” Followed by dramatic music and people jumping into jeeps and speeding away to Colorado! LOL Far from truth of the life of a forecaster.
BUT, it all comes back to San Francisco.
Weird quake
M 3.7 – 45km SSE of Currant, Nevada 2020-04-11 02:39:32 (UTC) 38.328°N 115.245°W 6.3 km depthHere are the other quakes, they soon will be dropping of the main feeds.
M 5.2 – 30km SE of Bodie, CA 2020-04-11 14:36:37 (UTC) 38.053°N 118.733°W 8.5 km depth
M 5.7 – 4km NNW of Magna, Utah 2020-03-18 13:09:31 (UTC) 40.751°N 112.078°W 11.9 km depth
M 6.5 – 70km W of Challis, Idaho 2020-03-31 23:52:30 (UTC) 44.491°N 115.118°W 10.0 km depth
M 5.0 – 41km W of Mentone, Texas 2020-03-26 15:16:27 (UTC) 31.708°N 104.039°W 6.6 km depthMy forecast point for Colorado
Score: 0
5.4 to 6.4 April 4 to April 22 38°11’38.84″N 104°37’29.89″W Pueblo Colorado. 160km/100mile radius. Southern Colorado System and Great Planes boarder area. Low spot between these two land masses. -
|
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.