-
115 ptslesterJuly 1, 2021 at 12:27 am #10705
Location: Piedmont, San Francisco Bay Area … 122’16’W – 37’49’N
Magnitude: 4.5 – 5.8
Margin: 250 Radial Kilometres
Period: From 00:15 UTC July 1, for 7 days
Like moths to a candle !…
On Tuesday 29th June at 01:29:47 UTC, an M 3.9 event occurred in the San Lorenzo district of the East Bay Area. There had already been 6 previous 2+ events in San Francisco since 1st June. But this was the strongest of the bunch, and had a citizen response of 442 with EMSC. Events like this have a tendency to bring out all the “self-proclaimed” experts… and then the rest of the time, you don’t see anyone. I do not claim to see all, and hear all myself, but at least I try to provide something that others can “see” for themselves !. In the case of US West Coast regions, experience has taught me that activity in regions like San Francisco, and Los Angeles, has more potential to occur above a Mag 4+ range, if a correlation is recorded in the ACE Satellite data… as per my methodology. On Wednesday 30th June at 08:13 UTC, a significant aspect change was recorded in the ACE MAG data. This corresponded with the sun being located on longitude 57’41’E at this time… the opposite longitude calculates as 122’19’W. Due to this opposite longitude correlation, I decided to check thing out and discovered other “notable” correlations correlations…
On Tuesday 8th June at 10:56:37 UTC, an M 5.7 event occurred in New Britain P.N.G. on coordinates 151’18’E – 5’10’S. At this time, the ATB threshold was located on San Francisco !
On Saturday 12th June between times 00:47:54 UTC – 07:28:16 UTC, the moon was located at its most northerly latitude of 25’38’N (Lunar Standstill !). At “12-hours earlier / later 12:47 UTC, it was sunrise in Piedmont !
On Wednesday 16th June at 20:09:42 UTC, an M 5.0 event occurred in New Britain P.N.G. on coordinates 150’45’E – 5’55’S. At this time, the sun was located on longitude 122’12’W !
On Friday 18th June between times 05:25 UTC – 05:51 UTC, the moon was located on the sunset threshold during “First Quarter” moon phase. At “12-hours earlier / later 17:25 UTC, the ATE threshold was located on San Francisco !
On Sunday 20th June at 17:24:33 UTC, an M 5.5 event occurred in the Kermadec Islands region on coordinates 177’30’W – 30’14’S. At this time, the ATE threshold was located on San Francisco !
On Wednesday 23rd June at 00:47:05 UTC, an M 5.4 event occurred in the Drake Passage region of the Antarctic Sea. At “12-hours” earlier / later, it was sunrise in Piedmont !
It is a “predictive” fact that it is very rare for any prediction attempt to actually hit the bullseye of an intended target. And that’s why we include a “Margin of Error” with our forecasts, to compensate for discrepancies. The reason why an M 3.9 event occurred in the East bay area on 29th June, is probably included in the list above, as a contributing factor. But I chose Piedmont as my bullseye on this occasion, because I am still mindful of the power outage that occurred here on Monday 7th June (Ref; S-Files in chat room … Sunspot leaves parting gift for SoCal !).
I only fly to the US candle… when it is lit by ACE !
Thank you
Score: 0115 ptslesterJuly 2, 2021 at 10:32 pm #10711On Friday 2nd July at 20:14:38 UTC, an M 6.1 event occurred in the Fiji Region on coordinates 179’21’W – 21’49’S. This epicentre does not correlate with any ephemeral data during the month of June. And does not correlate to any significant post seismic locations that occurred during the month of June. However, it appears to have been primed to occur, by a similar scenario related to the M 5.2 South Indian Ocean event of 1st July (Ref; Seismic Chess – Game 1 … post #10708 Dominican Republic).
Prior to this event occurring, at 18:37:12 UTC, it was sunrise on the M 6.1 Fiji epicentre on the stated coordinates… and the moon was located on longitude 179’21’W !
http://www.sunrisesunsetmap.com
http://www.fourmilab.ch/cgi-bin/EarthThis event has been posted here, because when it occurred at 20:14:38 UTC, the sun was located on longitude 122’36’W !
Score: 0 -
|
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.