-
5 ptsStickyhammerMarch 20, 2017 at 8:26 am #993
LOCATION : CASCADIA SUBDUCTION ZONE
MAGNITUDE: M8.5-9.0+
TIMING : AUGUST 18 THRU AUGUST 23, 2017
M8.5-9.0+ Earthquake Prediction for Aug. 18 thru Aug. 23, 2017. pic.twitter.com/EXbia8SodJ
— Stickyhammer (@stickyhammer) March 20, 2017
https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEmono/TSE2017/TSE2017fig/TSE2017-1.gif
This post has received 2 votes up.Score: 25 ptsStickyhammerMarch 20, 2017 at 8:27 am #994NOTICE ALSO THE RED LINES OVER YELLOWSTONE REGION AND NEW MADRID REGION!
- This reply was modified 7 years, 9 months ago by Stickyhammer.
29 ptsBen Davidson "S0"March 20, 2017 at 11:19 pm #1006Two solid forecasts in terms of being clear – any word on a method used? By stating it now you sort-of hold your place in line. If someone gets a big hit before you and says they use what you use, they may get some credit that could have gone to you. While open source, this forum is based on credit for ideas that have helped the community and hopefully one day, the world.
Score: 05 ptsStickyhammerMarch 21, 2017 at 1:07 am #1007The Method I used for this prediction deals with the Total Solar Eclipse on August 21st. I posted a Link under the map for the NASA eclipse website.
- This reply was modified 7 years, 9 months ago by Stickyhammer.
5 ptsStickyhammerMarch 22, 2017 at 2:08 pm #1024Maybe I should explain further. Ive been studying and predicting earthquakes based on eclipses for many years. Ive noticed a higher probability of earthquakes during or around (2-3 days before and 2-3 days after) the time of eclipses (50-75% uptick during Lunar Eclipses and 15-25% uptick during Solar Eclipses). As we know, Lunar Eclipses are on Full Moon when the Moon is on one side of our planet and the Sun on the opposite side in a direct linear aspect, where-as Solar Eclipses are on New Moon when both the Sun and Moon are on the same side of our planet, again in direct linear aspect. Gravity isn’t what we tend to believe it is. “IN MY OPINION” Gravity is more electromagnetic than mass and all things seek equilibrium via coaxial vortices. I don’t want to go any further into this but hopefully you get the idea.
This post has received 1 vote up.- This reply was modified 7 years, 9 months ago by Stickyhammer.
-
|
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.