-
17 pts
17 ptssubc0derApril 18, 2017 at 7:42 pm #1325I was trying to predict the best 7-day period to use but I clearly started the watch period a day late, my estimation of when that (S-) Coronal Hole force was going to affect us was off by a day. Which sucks because both areas I called out just had very deep (500+ km) 6.0 quakes… if these spots get hit before the 20th, which they likely will, that will make me 0/3 by dumb mistake.
This post has received 1 vote up.Score: 1
17 pts17 pts17 pts17 pts
17 ptssubc0derApril 25, 2017 at 7:40 pm #1420Thanks a lot man, I appreciate it. 🙂
I’ve been politely going back & forth with Tayrance too, grown-up discussion. I was just fully explaining my thoughts to him so hopefully he understands where I was coming from. I apologize profusely, I was just really upset about it because I genuinely thought I had it first.
Thanks again for looking into it and giving me a break, I really mean it.Again, I apologize for everything on my end, I let my emotions get the best of me and it won’t happen again.
Score: 017 ptsManagementApril 25, 2017 at 8:20 pm #1422You had it first, and more significantly. You had about very very small chance of success given the limitations, and yet, it worked. Might you make another reply to your success proclamation offering some rationale behind the forecast? I will want to include it in the semiannual letter. No need to make a new thread, just post on your success proclamation 🙂
This post has received 1 vote up.Score: 1 -
|
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.