-
115 pts115 pts11 ptsCounselorApril 14, 2018 at 10:37 pm #4349
Whoa! My son went down for a nap just now and I am seeing all these recent posts and kinda in disbelief. Have we really ended up in just that many spots jointly, and separately, based on these recent Azores quakes??
I was already telling people at work yesterday about our close miss in Japan, and was thrown when I saw the blot just north of that Bay of Plenty site (that feels like we’ve been working on forever), I am actively trying to monitor where I can to get screen shots of the goings on in these areas! 🙂 especially now that my wife and kid went down for a nap as I post this.
I hope there aren’t any other locations we’ve left out that may be just as likely…whatever…I am going to brew some of my favorite coffee anyway. 🙂
I keep getting wanting to do my particulates posting and keep getting distracted by the recent work… decisions decisions 🙂 I will try to come back later “Doc” 🙂
Score: 011 ptsCounselorApril 14, 2018 at 11:53 pm #4351Uh… is this a coincidence?
https://photos.app.goo.gl/3MRJqQhnY2MiVdkL2
Score: 0115 pts11 ptsCounselorApril 15, 2018 at 2:09 am #4354Then maybe you will enjoy this next one:
https://photos.app.goo.gl/3INADSOnMmqtNJgt1
Score: 011 ptsCounselorApril 15, 2018 at 5:40 pm #4356I have some more content to share that begs the question about what it is we are in fact observing with these power outages and their connections to other regions we have on watch!
When you can, but this seems curious to me. Look at the time stamp on the bull school images for the quake on the pac northwest versus the Vancouver power outages, look at the TEC images shifting from blue to red in that area, look at the recent mag fluxing from around 15april 1340 UTC to 1420. BTW this is currently under a watch for Suspicious0bserver.
I am excited to hear what you have, but the case of the curious power outage in Granada hills has be taking a closer look at this in connection to the Particulates post analysis work I am doing!
https://photos.app.goo.gl/ezbZGLKlquxjmOKA2
Score: 0115 ptslesterApril 15, 2018 at 8:42 pm #4357I don’t have an acceptable theoretical answer to how power outages relate to seismic anomalies… I can only speculate. Last month I created a model which held data related to the suns position, at the time of a 5.5+ earthquake taking place. As further events occurred, the Solar or lunar terminator thresholds were located on these post seismic sun positions, and seemed to fit the model as trigger points. I was giving day to day commentary on each position as it was contacted, My hope was that others would find reason for this to be possible. The only conclusion I came up with was my “footprint” hypothesis. At the moment of seismic occurrence, the sun would incident a positive or negative influence on Earth’s Magnetic field at that exact point from its zenith position… kind of like a bolt of lightning producing an unseen sun spot, or Earth spot in this scenario. Positive or negative energy in the form of specific frequencies is carried by the thresholds… when a combination of circumstances is established, the terminator comes into contact with our Earth spot and “BANG”, short circuit !. We have our own theory about a hypothetical circuit board connecting A to B, what we assume transits the tracks of our circuit board is electromagnetic energy. If “A” is the source and “B” the target, then speculating power outages on the basis of the Granada Hills experience, suggests locations of major power issues are caught up in a seismic short circuit because they are within close proximity to a pre-seismic event… a close neighbour to “B” !!.
I did the math related to the Puerto Rico power status alert, it is not mainland Puerto Rico that the math has focused on… it suggests a seismic anomaly maybe present on St Croix Ridge, 75 km’s Southeast of the Puerto Rico coastline. Granada Hills experienced the power outage… but the actual event occurred 74 miles West of here !
5th April 02:23 UTC – it was Sunset on 119.660’W – 33.850’N Santa Cruz Island, California (pre 5.3 epicentre). Also at this time, it was Moonrise on 64.440’W – 17.590’N Turner Hole Canyon, St Croix. If you include the pre 4 minute Moonrise influence (rising lunar terminator), the actual position is located on 65.400’W – 17.590’N St Croix Ridge.
5th April 19:29:17 UTC – a 5.3 event occurred in the Santa Cruz Island Region.
11th April 04:22:44 UTC – the sun was located on longitude 114.600’E… the opposite longitude calculates as 65.400’W St Croix Ridge. Also at 04:22:44 UTC, the moon was located on longitude 60.333’E… the opposite longitude calculates as 119.666’W Santa Cruz Island epicentre !
13th April 03:55 UTC – Power outage in Puerto Rico… it was Dusk on the 5.3 Santa Cruz Island epicentre at this time.
here’s a real twist in the tail…
15th April 22:27 UTC – the sun and moon are located on longitude 156.766’W… it is in fact New Moon. Also at this time, it is Moonset on 65.400’W – 17.590’N St Croix Ridge !!
You can see how easy I made that look, but actually it took hours to work out. The point is you can’t cheat the math, the sun and moon positions will only line up this accurately, if there is purpose for them to do so. Considering this is one power outage of many that occur globally, why would the math connect this one to something as significant as New Moon ?. You may recall, I correlated the last New Moon to the 6.8 Bolivia event.
I’ll check the rest of your posted data tomorrow, but I have know for a long time there is a connection, just like there is a whale connection, or a connection with the timing of a flux event… you have to make them work all the time otherwise they are just seen as coincidences.
Doc & Marty have not managed to make the grade yet !, my sister is starting to fade from my family portrait… maybe that’s a good thing 🙂
Score: 011 ptsCounselorApril 15, 2018 at 9:29 pm #4358If it is something big coming to st. Croix Ridge, then the blot activity would make sense near there too!
Does our radius that I initially set cover that space? I have been tempted to shift because of the activity near the British Virgin Islands.
BTW I hear you Doc 🙂
Score: 0115 ptslesterApril 15, 2018 at 10:16 pm #4359Yes! 250 radial kilometres from Puerto Rico is more than enough to cover it.
How many equations do you think it is possible to formulate from the Santa Cruz event ? 🙂
5th April 19:29:17 UTC – M 5.3 Channel Islands Region, California
15th April 19:30:44 UTC – M 5.9 NW of Kota Ternate, IndonesiaOn the 5th and 15th of April, it was and still is Sunrise on 158.575’E – 7.970’S Santa Isabel Trough, off Santa Isabel Island, Solomon Islands !. If there was no purpose to this time connection, why was it not dawn in Belgium, or Moonrise on Howland Island in the Pacific ??
btw – I am compiling a new bakery list… 13 locations from 20 days of satellite data, to see if there is a difference. If anybody noted the ACE MAG times yesterday, they can confirm the following: 09:42 UTC, significant Phi contact and aspect change… 21:31 UTC, Significant Phi contact. I calculated them as Sunset / Sunrise on 126.020’E – 3.650’N Pulau Sangihe Island, Molucca Sea 🙁
I did the same with the Friday the 13th contacts, and nothing has happened yet!… are you sure its only superstition ? 🙂
Score: 0115 ptslesterApril 16, 2018 at 5:24 pm #4362M 3.9 Alum Rock, California 16:39:26 UTC… the sun was located on longitude 69.916’W (Solar Noon on Drake Passage)… the moon was located on longitude 60.699’W, this longitude corresponds to 32 km’s off the East coast of Trinidad & Tobago. It was also Sunset on Rhodes Bank Western Turkey !
Score: 011 ptsCounselorApril 17, 2018 at 4:35 am #4367There were two quakes right? One in grapevine, California as well. Just three minutes from the one in Alum Rock. Similar magnitude. Curious.
I have a busy week this week. Maybe I will have time in the morning to look at things, but I may just observe for now. 🙂
Score: 011 pts115 ptslesterApril 18, 2018 at 11:00 pm #4374That’s OK… I’m to tired to climb up to that town hall clock today anyway 🙂
I’m trying a new strategy, 27 contacts on Guatemala and we get 4.5’s… 3 hits on Molucca Sea on 14th April, and a 5.9 occurs !
Making some changes to see what happens… new math suggests a felt event in Greece soon !
Score: 0115 ptslesterApril 19, 2018 at 11:22 pm #4378Chris… I have recorded a dramatic signal reduction today, between 11:58 UTC and 13:28 UTC. They correspond to Dawn / Sunrise along a 145 km region of the California shoreline, starting at 121.368’W – 35.590’N offshore San Simone, then heads SSE to 120.822’W – 34.280’N offshore Point Conception in the South region of Arguello Terrace. The converging threshold angles make it hard to give more accurate determination. This area is still within the Santa Cruz margin…
An alternative location relates to 11:58 UTC / 13:28 UTC… Sunset / Dusk on 99.090’E – 34.360’N Golog, Qinghai, China !
It seems I didn’t get my math right for a South of Africa adjustment, but I didn’t get everything wrong… it was Moonset in Greece when the Prince Edward Island event occurred !!
Score: 0115 ptslesterApril 20, 2018 at 2:34 pm #4380The first Phi contact and aspect change of UTC today, occurred at 06:52 UTC. The setting lunar terminator was located in the Los Angeles region. Combining this time with the data I posted yesterday, it corresponds to Dawn / Sunrise / Moonset on 120.760’W – 34.760’N at 8 km’s Offshore Vandenberg, California. It might also be worth bearing in mind, the rising lunar terminator was located on Bodrum, Western Turkey at this time !!
Score: 0115 ptslesterApril 20, 2018 at 3:20 pm #4381A little more… the only Ace contact I could find from collected data from 13th April, was a Phi contact at 20:03 UTC on the 18th. It was Solar Noon on this Vandenberg location, and Moonset in Greece. Moonrise in Vandenberg occurs today at 17:17 UTC, also at this time, it will be Moonrise on Drake Passage… Dawn in Bay of Plenty… and Sunset in Greece !
Score: 0115 pts11 pts115 ptslesterApril 23, 2018 at 9:57 pm #4397If I am reading the RSOE event time correctly, Mt Lo Volcano erupted at 10:12 UTC April 19th… it was Sunrise / Sunset on Mona Canyon and Lombok Basin respectively. When the Mt Kusatsu-Shirane event occurred at 04:31 UTC April 22nd… it was Moonset on St Croix Ridge, Puerto Rico
Now “that’s” interesting !!
Los Angeles may experience a felt event “soon”… the Vandeberg contacts are making daily appearances in the sat data !
Score: 011 pts115 ptslesterApril 24, 2018 at 12:30 am #4399I don’t think any adjustments are necessary, Vandenberg is still within the Santa Cruz margin. At 19:59 UTC today, a significant Phi contact and aspect change was recorded in the Mag data, the last contact before this one occurred at 10:36 UTC… quite a long uninterrupted run. At 19:59 UTC, the sun was located on longitude 120.183’W Vandenberg !… a further Phi contact at 20:22 UTC relates to Moonrise on the same location !
My Friday the 13th stunt hit a target 8 miles from centre… same target was featured in today’s SO news. Kind of ironic that would happen considering the reputable day in question 🙂
Score: 011 ptsCounselorApril 24, 2018 at 4:13 am #4401Not so unlucky after all? 🙂
I am even more fascinated by the extra insight you provided about those volcanoes! Just adds to ideas about how all of this is intertwined.
My apologies to you, and to Ben. I have so many post analysis examples of M5 quakes now that I am just waiting and watching for a bigger quake to get more of the information on those. Not collecting as much for forecasting at the moment. Realized again that some of this work has already been done, but I am trying to see if I can observe and demonstrate at the citizen scientist level for that share I made earlier about particulates.
I get easily distracted these days. My wife and I are expecting another baby soon. So, you may need to go it alone without Marty for a little…like you need my help :-p … Around the end of May I will be taking time even more time with fam. 🙂
Hoping we can get one of our joint forecasts before then?
Score: 0115 ptslesterApril 24, 2018 at 10:40 pm #4402Hey Chris,
Please accept my belated congrats to you and your wife… Mrs Doc and I are exited for you for the coming future. It is funny how we cooperate as buddies to try and achieve results on this forum… yet it is easy to forget we each have different plans in life outside this subject. I can understand you needing more family time, but don’t disappear for to long, otherwise my epitaph on the forum page will read as “Lester alias Doc”, last survivor of Quake Watch.Net 🙂
Don’t fool yourself !… I am starting to get a good feel about how to find these locations prior to event. I am able do this because we have spent the last twelve months helping each other out with different ideas. I believe if we didn’t have this bond, I would not be doing this now. Each forecast I post has a contribution from you… in fact, in your absence I might consider posting as counselor Lester 🙂
Yes!.. I “rely” on your continued help, don’t you forget that 🙂
A 5.3 has just occurred on my forecast location in South Sandwich Islands, which suggests my new strategy seems to be paying off. I may have found a way to narrow the time frame, but I am still at the mercy of unreliable magnitude determinations. This is were TEC, OLR and particulate data may make a difference, I also believe 6’s and 7’s do show in the satellite data, but they are as similarly defined as a 5.3 in South Sandwich… different data has to be the key to determining magnitude !
Anyway, if you are going to have another addition to your family… we had better start looking for 7’s 🙂
Score: 0 -
|
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.