• 115 pts
    lester
    September 9, 2017 at 12:53 pm #2853

    Ben,
    Simple triangulation using an earthquake, the earthquakes constituent terminator thresholds, and a satellite contact.

    The 8.1 Offshore Chiapas, Mexico event occurred at 04:49:21 UTC, the suns positional longitude at this time was 107.116’E. The magnetic field line of this longitude will have been energised or greatly influenced by the scale of the magnitude involved. However at this point, any pre-seismic influence on this longitude could include Mongolia, China, Indonesia and as far South as the Indian Antarctic Ridge.

    The co-ordinates of the 8.1 event are 93.715’W – 15.068’N, the terminator threshold times for this location on Sept 8 are as follows; DAWN 10:51 UTC… SUNRISE 12:04 UTC… SUNSET 00:22 UTC… Dusk 01:34… SOLAR NOON 18:12 UTC… Cross referencing these times against thresholds on 107.116’E .longitude, and the result is Sunset on 107.116’E – 9.345’S At the base of Java Ridge, West Java Indonesia.

    The ACE MAG data feed stopped for a short while yesterday, coinciding with Dawn on Cook Strait New Zealand… it re-established contact at 21:50 UTC. The data is coming from the sun, I therefore assume the data is on average 8 minutes old, adjusting the Feed stop time accordingly and the time is actually 21:42 UTC. Dawn on 107.116’E – 9.345’S at the base of Java Ridge occurs at 21:42 UTC, Sept 8.

    The Idea behind the “Follow the Clues” exercise is to demonstrate how pre-seismic locations can be determined by the terminator passing over them, and displaying a contact signature in the ACE data. If I may use an analogy; if you stuck a 1″ length of Scotch tape on the hood of your car, and then removed it. In reality, your own mental state is telling you that there is a difference on the surface of your hood because you know where you applied the tape… if you asked a colleague to check your hood, they would not see any difference. After a few days of driving around in the sunshine, you yourself would not remember the exact location you applied the tape, then a rain shower occurs and the moisture is repelled at this location. The Hydrogen molecules will not interact with elements in the residual adhesion… and it gives away the point you placed the tape. If you now imagine the Earth has the same treatment in the lithosphere in multiple locations, as was done with the hood of your car. The terminator can pass over these locations without giving away their position, like it was driving on a sunshiny day. When the terminator is influenced by an increase in the solar wind, it becomes energies and therefore akin to a rain shower in the analogy. Energy’s at the pre-seismic location repel energy from the terminator threshold like a positive / negative proton reaction, and this signature is recorded mostly in the Phi data. Combining the solar wind with a CME impact for instance, and the signature is shown in multiple data’s, you have a thunder storm… add influence from a Class X 9.3 and you have a hurricane !

    Another point of the exercise relates to the laws of probability. If you place multiple predictions or forecasts as I have done over the past 20 days, probability states the more regions that are covered, the more likely you are going to be able to hit a target anyway. If you can show the effort involved in determining said location… laws of probability should not apply!

    To conclude with your question… what I am seeing in the data in relation to the contacts posted in this thread, will depend on how many rain showers or thunderstorms these locations are exposed to over the coming days. Java was hit by a hurricane related to the 8.1 in Mexico, if something occurs within 250 radial kilometres of the stated co-ordinates in the next 20 days, then may be we can talk more!

    If you try the analogy on your car… don’t forget to shampoo it after 🙂

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    September 9, 2017 at 12:56 pm #2854

    Apologies… Sunset on Java at the start of my post occurs at 10:51 UTC, Sept 8

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    September 9, 2017 at 7:06 pm #2855

    Sept 9 Ischia Island revisited (ref; Aug 22 Ischia Island event)

    Ever since a 4.3 occurred in the Tyrrhenian Sea on August 21 (eclipse day), I have been puzzled like a lot of people why it was so fatal and destructive to the residents of Ischia Island, off the coast of Italy (12 miles SE of the epicentre). I have also been intrigued by the contacts I have been reporting related to Mount Vesuvius, 24 miles East of Ischia Island. I did not envision a repeat of Pompeii, but due to a couple of events today, I found a common denominator between these two locations on 13.660’E – 42.240’N Bominaco, Central Italy.

    T sequence for Bominaco, Central Italy Sept 9
    DAWN 03:03 UTC… SUNRISE 04:40 UTC… SOLAR NOON 11:04 UTC…

    Solar Noon on 133.98’E – 4.92’S Near South Coast of Papua, Indonesia (5.4 epicentre, Sept 9) … 03:03 UTC, Sept 9
    Sunrise on 42.084’E – 6.300’N Raaso, Ethiopia (X 2.2 footprint, Sept 6) … 03:03 UTC, Sept 9
    Class M 3.7 Solar flux event ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, … 11:04 UTC, Sept 9
    Sunset on 160.070’W – 7.010’S West of Starbuck Island (ref; Sept 5 first entry + 22:40 UTC) … 04:40 UTC, Sept 9
    (when the MAG data feed commenced at 05:50 UTC, Sept 9, it was Dusk on the co-ordinates West of Starbuck Island!)

    Future correlations…

    Sunrise on 13.660’E – 42.240’N Bominaco, Central Italy … 04:46 UTC, Sept 13
    Dawn on 0.916’W – 6.249’N New Abirem, Ghana West Africa (X 9.3 footprint, Sept 6) … 04:46 UTC, Sept 13
    Solar Noon on 107.116’E – 9.345’S Java Ridge, Java Indonesia … 04:46 UTC, Sept 13 !!

    Whilst reviewing Vesuvius, I discovered it has been sharing the same sunrise time as Bominaco since August 20. And it has currently been sharing Dawn / Sunrise / Sunset times since September 6… therefore most contacts listed relate to Bominaco!

    The Ischia connection…

    2017-08-21 18:57:52 UTC – M 4.3 Tyrrhenian Sea Region … 13.870’E – 40.780’N

    Solar Noon in the Tyrrhenian Sea (Ischia Island) on the co-ordinates stated … 11:09 UTC, Aug 21
    Solar Noon in Bominaco, Italy on the co-ordinates stated … 11:09 UTC, Aug 21

    Most of my combinations are trial and error… I don’t think this is one of them !

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    September 10, 2017 at 11:16 pm #2867

    The MAG data feed stopped at 22:10 UTC, Sept 10 – relevant too current work in progress!

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    September 11, 2017 at 12:08 pm #2869

    Relevant data related to the Class X 8.2 flux event…

    Sept 10 15:55 UTC – Start of increase in EPAMe 315 keV data…

    Dawn on 168.84’E – 54.55’N Nikol’Skoye (7.7 epicentre, July 17)
    Sunrise on 160.495’W – 66.030’N East of Buckland, Alaska

    Sept 10 16:02 UTC – Start of increase in EPAMp 53 keV data…

    Solar Noon on 61.656’W – 18.090’N Antigua & Barbuda
    Solar Noon on 61.080’W – 12.840’N St Vincent and the Grenadines

    Sept 10 16:06 UTC – Class X 8.2 flux event + increase in SIS data…

    Geocentric position of the sun on 62.283’W – 4.683’N Rio Icabaru River, Southeast Venezuela

    T sequence for Rio Icabaru river, Sept 10…
    SUNRISE 10:02 UTC… SUNSET 22:10 UTC… DUSK 23:21 UTC…

    Dusk on 133.97’E – 4.98’S Near South Coast of Papua, Indonesia (5.3 epicentre, Sept 8) … 22:10 UTC,. Sept 10
    Sunset on 61.080’W – 12.840’N St Vincent and the Grenadines … 22:10 UTC, Sept 10
    Dusk on ,,,,,,,,,, – ,,,,,,,,,, St Vincent and the Grenadines … 23:21 UTC, Sept 10

    2017-09-10 21:40:21 UTC – M 5.9 Raykjanes Ridge … 33.50’W – 57.14’N
    Dusk on 107.116’E – 9.345’S Java Ridge, West Java Indonesia … 21:40 UTC, Sept 10

    Solar Noon on 33.50’W – 57.14’N Raykjanes Ridge … 14:11 UTC, Sept 10
    Positional longitude of the moon on 160.683’W (East of Buckland, Alaska!)

    Sept 10 22:10 UTC – MAG data feed stops… ref; Rio Icabaru T sequence above!!

    …………………………………………………………………….

    Sept 11 08:12 UTC – Contact in MAG Phi…

    Positional longitude of the moon on 61.250’W (Antigua & Barbuda / St Vincent’s !)

    Sept 11 08:42 UTC – Contact in MAG Phi… Dusk on 61.656’W – 18.090’N Antigua & Barbuda

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    September 11, 2017 at 12:11 pm #2870

    Error… Dusk on 5.3 Papua epicentre 10:02 UTC, Sept 10

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    September 11, 2017 at 7:55 pm #2871

    Sept 11 relevant data…

    2017-09-11 17:35:12 UTC – M 5.6 Iwo Jima, Japan … 142.348’E – 24.014’N

    T sequence for Iwo Jima
    DAWN 19:01 UTC… SUNSET 08:40 UTC… DUSK 09:56 UTC…

    Dusk on 13.660’E – 42.240’N Bominaco, Central Italy … 19:01 UTC, Sept 11
    Dawn on 61.656’W – 18.090’N Antigua & Barbuda … 08:40 UTC, Sept 11
    Sunrise on 61.656’W – 18.090’N Antigua & Barbuda … 09:56 UTC, Sept 11
    Sunrise on 61.080’W – 12.840’N St Vincent and the Grenadines … 09:56 UTC, Sept 11
    (last 2 locations have a parallel connection with “Off West Coast of Northern Colombia”!)

    2017-09-10 19:58:10 UTC – M 4.0 San Donato, Central Italy … 13.320’E – 42.090’N
    This event occurred 19 miles West of Bominaco, Central Italy, EMSC logged 93 felt responses

    “What, if anything, can you say you are starting to see in the data”… same thing I have been seeing for over a Decade !

    This can be “VERIFIED” using T&D and suncalc.net

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    September 18, 2017 at 10:13 pm #2890

    The Ischia Saga continues…

    During my 20 day space data pilgrimage, I had included multiple entries referring to Mount Vesuvius and Foveaux Strait, New Zealand. As I had mentioned before, a repeat of Pompeii is not likely due to our advanced warning systems, and Foveaux Strait does not appear to have any history of significant seismic activity. I reworked the entries and found the common denominator was on 14.700’E – 42.100’N Vasto, East Coast, Central Italy (Lester:Sept 16, 11:21 pm). Each entry relating to the above mentioned locations, also relates to Dawn / Dusk / Sunrise / Sunset in Vasto!.

    I originally did the math on the satellite termination feed times… they led me to Vasto, and hence to the rework! I noted an explanation on SO news related to the ACE feed terminations being the result of ground station reassignments , I can live with this… because I no longer have to carry the consequences of this being wrong on my shoulders!

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    September 20, 2017 at 12:01 am #2895

    Playing the Numbers Game… How am I Correlating this Data ?

    2017-09-19 18:14:39 UTC – M 7.1 5km ENE of Raboso, Mexico … 98.399’W – 18.584’N
    …………………………………………………………………………

    Forecast = Lester: Sept 12, 11:48 pm – Western Region of Flores Sea … 117.730’E – 7.930’S
    Event = 2017-09-18 00:32:28 UTC – M 4.3 Flores Region, Indonesia … 119.360’E – 8.170’S
    (this event occurred 153 km’s West of forecast co-ordinates)

    Dawn on 98.399’W – 18.584’N Raboso, Mexico … 11:10 UTC, Sept 19
    Dusk on 119.360’E – 8.170’S Flores Region, Indonesia … 11:10 UTC, Sept 19
    (please note – Sunset in Raboso occurred at 00:32 UTC on Sept 18 !!)
    …………………………………………………………………………

    Forecast = Lester: Sept 13, 10:04 pm – South Coast of Panama … 80.660’W – 7.440’N

    Sunset on 98.399’W – 18.584’N Raboso, Mexico … 00:31 UTC, Sept 19
    Dusk on 80.660’W – 7.440’N South Coast of Panama … 00:31 UTC, Sept 19
    (parallel T connection)
    …………………………………………………………………………

    Forecast = Lester: Sept 16, 11:27 pm – South of Tasmania … 146.910’E – 51.600’S

    M 7.1 Raboso, Mexico earthquake occurred at 18:14:39 UTC, Sept 19
    Dawn on 146.910’E – 51.600’S South of Tasmania … 18:15 UTC, Sept 19
    …………………………………………………………………………

    Forecast = Lester: Sept 13, 12:08 am – Isla Mocha Island, Bio Bio Chile… 74.270’W – 38.380’S
    Event = 2017-09-19 18:14:41 UTC – M 4.6 Offshore Bio Bio Chile … 74.185’W – 37.221’S
    (this event occurred 2 seconds after the 7.1 in Raboso!)
    ………………………………………………………………………….

    As I have mentioned in my last entry, an explanation for the ACE data feed terminations has been covered (“twice”), and I am accepting this, so the following is a little hypothetical maths…

    On Sept 11, the data feed terminated at 22:21 UTC, and each day since this time has increased by 1 minute increments, resulting in a termination time of 22:28 UTC on Sept 18. I have no knowledge of satellite change over procedures, so I can only assume the reason for not having a set UTC point relates to the satellites orbital difference in regards Earth’s changing axis per seasonal period. However hypothetically, these times also match with Sunrise over the same period on 109.014’E – 43.246’N, which places you 8 km’s NNW of Khatanbulag in the Gobi Desert, Mongolia. On Sept 11, Solar Noon in Khatanbulag occurred at 04:41 UTC, this time also matched with Sunrise in Vasto, Central Italy. These locations shared this time bond until the 15th, and combined with the other data I had, I subsequently posted a forecast for Vasto, and after today’s event in Mexico, I can only assume the following to be coincidental…

    Sunrise on 98.399’W – 18.584’N Raboso, Mexico … 12:23 UTC, Sept 19
    Dusk on 109.014’E – 43.246’N Khatanbulag, Mongolia … 12:23 UTC, Sept 19
    ……………………………………………………………………

    Whilst typing this post, I have noted the ACE MAG data feed has terminated at 22;15 UTC, the pattern has changed due to the 7.1 in Mexico!. The time of 22:15 UTC is an exact match to Sunrise today on 115.110’E – 10.720’S Lombok Basin, Indonesia. The last time I matched it to Lombok was Sept 7 at 22:22 UTC… who is playing the numbers game with who ?

    If a hypothetical earthquake occurs in Italy, I shall be content in just to trying for the prize money… I don’t like wasting effort !

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    September 20, 2017 at 12:36 am #2897

    Forgive my last remark… frustration with this subject over many years has made me embittered !

    Score: 0
Viewing 10 posts - 76 through 85 (of 85 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Start typing and press Enter to search