Forum Replies Created
-
115 ptslesterJuly 3, 2017 at 2:11 pm #1924
A wise decision Counselor, stay with HookEcho and the science for now. If you see a marked improvement with my current forecasts …you will know weather it is worth spending 40 bucks in the future 🙂
I haven’t used it myself for a long time, but the darn thing keeps going crazy every time the sun passes 96’E or 84’W !!!
Score: 0115 pts115 ptslesterJune 28, 2017 at 6:08 pm #1899A small experiment you may consider trying sometime, you need a plasma globe, dipole antenna and an audible EM sensor. If you made a small VLF dipole antenna (45 cm’s diagonally) with 80 – 100 copper winding’s, and hang this on a wall in your office or workshop, preferably in a North/South orientation. Then attach the external probe of an EM sensor to the same wall, approx 15 cm’s from the equatorial point of the antenna. I have one called “Cell Sensor” cellular phone/ EMF detection device, I got it on eBay for around $40.
VLF propagation is affected by differing solar environments, particularly solar flares. The antenna is designed to receive very low frequency transmissions, but it is also receiving solar energy. If you place your finger on the plasma globe, and hold the finger of your other hand, approx 1 cm from the wire at the base of the antenna (hovering), and move your finger at this distance towards the sensor. It will give an audible warning when you have reached a specific distance. Removing your finger from the globe stops the alarm, you have in effect transferred EM energy fro the plasma globe into the antenna using your own body… it doesn’t sound very exiting at this point. However, if you did this on a regular basis, particularly 4 – 5 days after new moon, on certain occasions you will find the alarm will go off when your finger is upto 25 cm’s distance from the wire… the reason being, a heavy EM presence already occupies the copper. If you note the position of the sun, moon and terminator at this time, and note were they are when the energy drops off, you may gain a rough indication of a potential seismic region!
Couple of down sides – it doesn’t work very well in urban areas, possibly due to close proximity of grid outlets. And it can play havoc with television reception, missed many a good show on TV because of this device!
It’s not a Tesla Coil, but it can transmit energy without wires 🙂
Thank you again for the moon info…
Score: 0115 ptslesterJune 27, 2017 at 3:02 pm #1894HookEcho, apologies for not getting back to you yesterday …my group therapy session finished later than expected 🙂
Actually, I was attempting to try and establish the moons angular position in Earth’s plasma tail at 18:24 UTC June 23. I was doing a follow up (unsuccessfully I might add) on your comment “Due to the moon residing in Earth’s plasma tail”. At 18:24 UTC June 23, I noted an aspect change in magnetic field data, nothing major but it got my attention because the moon was on longitude 100′ 36′ W… a close match to my West Chile Rise forecast. The sun didn’t interest me at first, but you know from my past accounts, I believe these aspect changes are related to the sun leaving a footprint in the field lines. I ran a basic sequence from the aspect change, to the time the 6.1 occurred near Tonga, and this is what I came up with…
Aspect change confirmed as 18:24 UTC June 23 – sun on co-ordinates 95′ 25′ W – 23′ 25′ N, this places you in the Mexican Ridges Region, Gulf of Mexico. 18:24 UTC also happens to be the time of Sunrise on co-ordinates 176′ 34′ W – 19′ 26′ S (soon to be 6.1 epicentre Tonga!), and Dawn (18:24 UTC) on positional co-ordinates 140′ 36′ E – 23′ 24′ N, which is South of Io canyon, Izu Islands, Japan. On 2017-06-24 02:37:18 UTC, a 5.6 occurred in Mozambique. Also at this time (02:38 UTC) it was Dusk on co-ordinates 95′ 25′ W – 23′ 25′ N (Mexican Ridges Region!). New moon occurred at 02:41 UTC June 24 (alignment from sun to Earth), the sun’s position at this time was co-ordinates 140′ 36′ E – 23′ 24′ N (Io canyon, Izu Islands region!). On 2017-06-25 17:42:30 UTC, a 6.1 occurred NW of NuKu’alofa, Tonga, it was Sunset on co-ordinates 26′ 31′ E – 38′ 85′ N, Lesvos Basin, Western Turkey (6.3 epicentre, June 12) at 17:42 UTC.
The first thing that struck me when I compared this sequence to those I had posted previously, was that there doesn’t seem to be a moon correlation… I ran the sequence twice more, but had the same results. It may indicate as you suggested “a combined gravitational pull, or an increase in EM influence… the sun obviously being the dominant source. Something happened in the Near Earth environment at 18:24 UTC June 23. I’m afraid my words are not as eloquent as yours, but if the sun “is” leaving a footprint on the Earth, there has to be some kind of counter effect in space… and unfortunately, this is not my territory.
There is also the question, why are correlations continuing with the 6.3 epicentre in Western Turkey. It is as if plasma from the core has punched an EM hole in Earth’s surface from beneath, and it is continuing to vent radiation, like a searchlight on the clouds… waiting for the terminator to fly into it!. Again, I am just theorising, which I agree can be fun, but I believe focus should be about the lead up too, rather than the orbital event itself!
Forgive my humour at the start of this post, I have been the object of ridicule and humiliation on many occasions due to this subject, I try to turn thing around and make it more humorous… there by making their punchlines less effective. It is also one reason I changed lanes on the discussion when I did, a chance to stay under the radar so to speak. I did not take consequences to you into account, so please accept my late deserved apology… and urge you to go with your original idea.
I shall be trying to focus on forecasting for the immediate future, I have been using online data and sources supplied on this site, I have a few hits in self proclamations, but I also have a couple of toys of my own that I wish to test, to see if they can make a difference… they help me look for footprints 🙂
Score: 0115 pts115 ptslesterJune 24, 2017 at 8:23 pm #1884Thank you for a very thorough and plausible explanation, changeovers could contribute to data feed disruption. However, I read an article in science press, some time in September/October’ish last year (I’m afraid I don’t recall which one). the corespondent reported a delay in decommissioning the ACE satellite, because they were still trying to solve issues with DSCOVR. Ace and DSCOVR were both experiencing data feed breaks through October into November… from mid-November, everything went back to normal! It’s not the first time I have received a similar explanation, but I’ll agree with you until further data becomes available (or not), and the matter can be discussed further.
Interesting theory that you believe a volcanic eruption altered the strength of the energy discharge at your forecast point… because I believe in the very same thing. If you imagine the Earth as a plasma globe, similar to what you see at a science fair. It is displaying multiple EM discharges from a central electrical point (core), which come into contact with the glass. You place a finger against the top of the globe, and it cause an attraction to the plasma, but there is only a small percentage of attraction. If you place your finger on one side of the globe at an equatorial level, same thing happens. But if you then place your whole palm on the opposite equatorial level at the same time, all the plasma heads for your palm, and there will be absolutely no attraction to your finger. Similarly, you have a nice little 5.5+ lined up, then a 7+ goes off and changes the attraction!… robbing you of a HIT. Of course, this is only my interpretation, and shouldn’t be taken as science 101, one interesting point with the globe though, when you remove your palm the plasma discharges increase by 200%, and re-stabilise to normal levels after a few seconds… similar to hundreds of aftershocks after the 6.3 Turkey event etc.
I have such a globe in my observatory… If one is to play the part of a crazy scientist, a plasma globe is essential 🙂
Score: 0115 ptslesterJune 23, 2017 at 11:11 pm #1874HookEcho, you mentioned “Triple Junction” in your reply, assuming it may be of consequence, then further information of assistance may be; on June 24, when it is sunrise precisely on the West Chile Rise at 13:56 UTC, it is dusk precisely on the Triple Junction location. This is a last day correlation, on the 25th Triple Junction changes to 13:57 UTC… Sure hope Richard is keeping a map of all these points 🙂
Score: 0115 pts115 ptslesterJune 23, 2017 at 6:23 pm #1871Thank you HookEcho, I am impressed with how quick you are able to source the necessary information, and bring it to hand… I have enough trouble remembering where I parked my car 🙂 your understanding is appreciated.
I was deliberating the behavioural pattern of the CIR, is it interrelated with specific orbital cycles ? I have been trying to establish a sequence for forecast related purposes, but it may also give insight towards the current solar environment. Please indulge me with the following…
I have spent most of the past month, trying to log the data feed breaks related to the Ace satellite, particularly the mag monitor. Most feeds have been cutting off in the 23:30’s UTC range. A bit late for me, but I managed to log 20 times in total from 25th May (first break in weeks)… I only managed 20 because I got tired of drinking water!. Of the total, I separated eight individual times (40%) which I deemed comparable with a terminator boundary.
25/5 – 23:38 UTC
26/5 – 23:36 UTC
29/5 – 23:35 UTC
01/6 – 23:35 UTC
04/6 – 23:32 UTC
05/6 – 23:31 UTC
11/6 – 23:32 UTC
19/6 – 23:30 UTCThe times above are compatible with the changing times of Sunset within 5 radial kilometres of co-ordinates 99′ 57′ W – 36′ 12′ S, West Chile Rise (Lester:June 18 2017, 8:58 pm). I happen to believe ground anomalies are capable of affecting satellite transmission… but everyone to their own !
On June 19 at 07:14:51 UTC, the sun reached it’s most Northerly (solstice) latitude on co-ordinates 71′ 38′ E – 23′ 26′ N. At this time (07:15 UTC), it is also Sunrise on co-ordinates 28′ 01′ W – 19′ 26′ N, approx 600 km’s NNE of Cape Verde.
The sun remains at this lateral position until 00:54:45 UTC June 23, at which point it starts it’s journey South. 00:54 UTC is also the time of Dusk on co-ordinates 78′ 18 W – 9′ 32′ N Panama, and Dawn on co-ordinates 26′ 31′ E – 38′ 85′ N Lesvos Basin, Western Turkey (6.3 epicentre).
On June 24, at 07:56:10 UTC, the moon reaches it’s most Northerly latitude of the month, on co-ordinates 64′ 52′ E – 19′ 26′ N. These co-ordinates relative to Earth, place you 350 km’s East of Murray Ridge, in the Arabian Sea. Position of the sun at this time is co-ordinates 61′ 35′ E – 23′ 24′ N, Again, this places you on the Omar Basin, North Arabian Sea. LATE ADDITION – it will be Dusk on co-ordinates 167′ 01′ E – 11′ 10′ S (5.1 epicentre, Solomon Islands 2017-06-23 15:37:13 UTC)
At 14:23:54 UTC June 24, the moon again starts heading South, it’s co-ordinates at this time are 28′ 01′ W – 19′ 26′ N (approx 600 km’s NNE of Cape Verde!). Also at this time (14:23 UTC), it is sunset on co-ordinates 64′ 52′ E – 19′ 26′ N (350 km’s East of Murray Ridge, Arabian Sea!). The moon also shares the same longitude as the 5+ events in the South Sandwich Islands on Tuesday (June 20).
Conclusion – When Sunset reaches co-ordinates 99′ 57′ W – 36′ 12′ S, West Chile rise at 23:36 UTC on June 24, it will also be Dawn (23:36 UTC) on co-ordinates 64′ 52′ E – 19′ 26′ N (350 km’s East of Murray Ridge, Arabian Sea), Dawn (23:36 UTC) on co-ordinates 61′ 35′ E – 23′ 24′ N (Oman Plain, North Arabian Sea), and Sunset (23:36 UTC) on co-ordinates 78′ 18′ W – 9′ 32′ N (Panama).
The positional data is not the point I am trying to convey, because combined with satellite disruption, it becomes hypothetical in nature. It is the period of time the sun and moon occupies their respective latitudes. If you hold a magnifying glass over a sheet of paper, and focus light from the sun on a specific point. It is only a matter of time before you burn a hole through the paper! I believe the sun and moon in similar respects are doing the same thing when their orbital positions place them on static latitudes for long periods. The CIR could be enhancing this effect, but it still leaves the problem… where is the light being focused too ?
I don’t know if any of this has relevance , but you may see something worth adding to the equation…
Score: 0115 ptslesterJune 22, 2017 at 2:15 pm #18582017-06-12 12:28:37 UTC M 6.3 Le’svos Basin, Western Turkey – geocentric position of the sun, 7′ 10′ W – 23′ 11′ N
Sunset on co-ordinates 70′ 43′ E – 26′ 37′ S, Triple Junction, Central Indian Ocean Ridge, 12:29 UTC (Lester:June 11 10:09 pm)2017-06-22 12:31:04 UTC M 6.8 Offshore Guatemala – geocentric position of the sun, 7′ 15′ W – 23′ 26′ N
Sunset on co-ordinates 70′ 43′ E – 26′ 37′ S, Triple Junction, Central Indian Ocean Ridge, 12:31 UTCHookEcho, I am continuing to try and digest the material you are posting, but I’m afraid some of this too me, is like trying to speak fluent French after not having used it for 30 years. I don’t know if the data above means we are venturing into the Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere-Magnetosphere coupling system territory. But if you correlate this with the Guatemala information in my previous post, from an old engineers point of view, I’d say the sun had just stepped back into it’s own “magnetic footprint” again !!
I’ll do my best to try and keep up…
Score: 0115 pts115 ptslesterJune 21, 2017 at 7:53 pm #1851HookEcho, I am reviewing the research links you provided, but as yet no association, I’ll need a few days to wake up some memory cells, but in the meantime, I thought the following may be of interest.
My research has been primarily centred on frequency, the interactions of dusk and dawn with the aforementioned locations follows this accordingly. I made note of positional data from the 11th which could be informative as insight to investigating this further. Solar noon in the lesvos basin, Western Turkey 26.31′ E – 38.85′ N (6.3 epicentre) occurred at 10:15 UTC June 11. This changed to 10:16 UTC on the 12th (day of the event) and 13th. Meanwhile, it was dawn at 10:17 UTC on co-ordinates 91.76′ W – 15.10′ N, epicentre of the 6.9 Guatemala event June 14. The data seems consistent with long wavelength correlation, in the region of IR 3000 nm – 1mm, bordering on microwave perhaps!. If the terminator thresholds are not generally something you monitor, I thought it might be useful information.
Could you tell me if there is any way to access previous Blot Echo data, for say the last 30 days ? working a hunch…
Score: 0115 ptslesterJune 20, 2017 at 10:59 pm #1828If you think a professional squabbler, who always comes out on top, and a cantankerous old fool with a few marbles missing, can hit it off and make a difference to seismic science… that alone is worth paying $150 to see 🙂 I admire your passion for what you are trying to achieve, and I have already concluded for myself that you are much smarter than me. I am more the engineer/experimental type, I can find the pieces, but it will be someone like you that will eventually put them together, and find an answer.
I have had a framed inscription hanging on my wall for years “Sed tantum de tempore”. I would like to think this is possible before I reach the stage that I need help to go to the bathroom… a few years left in the old dog before I have to worry about that though!
This is your show… so where do we start?
Score: 0115 ptslesterJune 20, 2017 at 8:10 pm #1826I thought I would respond with a little bit of info on a couple of earthquakes that occurred today in the South Sandwich Islands…
2017-06-20 12:54:36 UTC M 5.3 Visokoi Island region, South Sandwich Islands, 27.081′ W – 56.263′ S
2017-06-20 13:02:29 UTC M 5.2 Visokoi Island Region, South Sandwich Islands, 27.439′ W – 56.051′ SI posted a forecast for this area last Wednesday (Lester: June 14 2017, 10:53 pm), the epicentres of the 5.3 and 5.2 occurred at 165 km’s and 136 km’s SSE of my forecast co-ordinates respectively… but are securely within my posted margin. Unfortunately, my posted magnitude was for a 6+, weather two 5’s in close proximity and closely timed occurrences could display the same signature as a 6 in space weather data, is plausible but not acceptable.
When the 5.3 occurred at 12:54:36 UTC, the sun was at an orbital distance from Earth of 152015217 km’s. When the next event occurred at 13:02:29 UTC, the sun had reseeded to a distance of 152015273 km’s, a difference of 56 km’s.
Today (June 20), Dawn occurred on co-ordinates 27.081′ W – 56.263′ S and 27.439′ W – 56.051′ S at 08:00 UTC and 08:02 UTC respectively. The Earth’s orbital rotation speed is recognised as being 1675 km/h, which equates to 29.916 km’s per minute, if we double this to match the Dawn time difference between the epicentres, two minutes equates to 55.833 km’s… very close to the distance the sun travelled between the event times.
As you probably know, the Dawn and Dusk times are defined to the minute, and related to the sun’s lateral position below the horizon. Sunrise and Sunset are defined by a band period, related to duration on the horizon i.e sunrise duration today in Kodiak Island, Alaska is 13:18 – 13:24 UTC = 6 minutes. Sunrise today in Java, Indonesia is 23:08 – 23:10 UTC = 2 minutes etc. If you go to co-ordinates 13′ 14′ W – 23′ 26′ N, you end up in the Western Sahara, East of Mijek. Yesterday, the Sunset band at this location was between 19:40 UTC and 19:43 UTC… 19:40 UTC and 19:43 UTC are also the times of Dusk on the 5.2 and 5.3 epicentres respectively. Today, the sun was on 13′ 14′ W – 23’26 N at 12:54:36 UTC… same time the 5.3 occurred!
Near the beginning of this thread, I posted information related to the 6.3 event in Western turkey. on the day the event occurred, Dusk at the epicentre was at the same time as Dusk is at the 5.3 event is today 19:40 UTC. Dusk on the 6.3 epicentre now is 19:43 UTC, same as the 5.2 event!
Speculation – major seismic events are leaving a footprint in Earth’s magnetic field, when the right orbital combination is achieved, parallel area’s within the terminator threshold, `related to position at the time of the event, can become active!
I always find a lot of correlations, but I need help putting the pieces together… unfortunately, that appears to have been blow again. I just wanted to do a little science before I regretfully excuse myself from this thread. There have been misunderstandings on both sides, I don’t do squabbles, and I don’t play ping pong with words… so I am bowing out to your better judgement, and sincerely wish you the best with your transmigration theories.
Score: 0115 ptslesterJune 20, 2017 at 1:12 pm #1824There was a time when I became so obsessed with this subject, that I put it before everything else. I lost all my friends, my business suffered, my house was falling down around me, and it put a heavy strain on my marriage. The final straw came when I had one “head butting session” too many, and suffered a nervous breakdown. I ended up as a “nut job”, which seems to be word of the month in the US at the moment. Part of the problem I had, was realising there are two different agendas with predicting earthquakes. One agenda is to find an answer, there by saving thousands of lives. And another agenda for keeping the way things are, unless an “actual” published scientist discovers a sound reason, within current beliefs on how things work… so I’m afraid what ever thick skin I had then, has gone bye and bye.
Know my stuff… I would be the first to hold my hand up and admit I didn’t. It would be very naive and presumptuous of me to claim otherwise. I know pieces of my hypothesis here and there, but I don’t know how they fit together. That is why my quest to have it investigated by people more knowledgeable than myself, was so important to me.
Back up my claims… no I can’t do that either. My family confiscated my research and equipment because of the reasons stated above. As I mentioned when I joined, I am here now purely for mental exercise. I have to rely on somebody else’s data feeds to determine a forecast now, so in effect, I am here for the entertainment value, nothing more. I no longer have issues with this subject, and my family knows this, but when I am discreetly handed my cocoa and slippers, it is their way of saying turn off the monitor… I occasionally get a late post in when I sneak down for a glass of water 🙂
Regarding a detour to the chat room… It was not my intention to step on any toes here, the discussion thread was your idea and your baby, and I gave respectful consideration and option at the time… I put the ball in your park. I can understand you reason for starting it in the forecast forum, in fact, had it been there when I joined, I would have gladly continued debating quake issues for free. I would still be in pocket by $150, and so would everybody else… well, almost everybody!! This thread has been running for eight days since, and this is your first response. I have had my fill of BS and bitching in the past, and I just want to get on with the science… if you want to move this back to the forecast forum, then I repeat “I have no problem complying with your wishes”…
My method of detection is reliant on energy build ups “near the surface of the Earth”, coming into limb contact when orbital rotation brings them within range of the sun… but I can only speculate how the energy gets there. Your method is based on periodic increased energy output from the core, which migrates up to a point “near the surface of the Earth”. Every idea is a long shot, but what if A + B had the potential to equal C. You have to ask yourself what comes first, the science or standings within the realms of one’s higher peers… lets follow the true agenda and do some good here!
Thank you for the research links… I appreciate the time you have taken to source them.
Score: 0115 pts115 ptslesterJune 18, 2017 at 6:51 pm #1815Hello Councelor, regarding your question; I am not tracking anything specific, but from experience I have become accustom to observing anomalous signatures in space data, and relating them to limb contacts between Earth and the sun. As I explained earlier, if you observe a signature of significance, and assume this to be a Dawn/Sunrise contact, take note what area’s the terminator threshold encompasses at this time. When the same area’s reach Sunset/Dusk, at some point along the angle of the terminator, a further signature may develop on a specific point of the angle, thus giving away a possible seismic location… you just have to know what to look for. If the signature develops into a moderately sized event, it is possible to determine a correlation with past events, within a given period. The trick is to try and get ahead of the sequence to determine which of the anomalous signatures will develop into an active event, or become a point of propagation. I have compiled a list for you to try and demonstrate what I mean. The list comprises of correlations between all 5+ events that occurred yesterday (June 17 2017), and events of similar magnitudes from the past 20 days. The times are accurate to the minutes stated at each location, and the locations are accurate to within 5 km’s of the epicentres listed by EMSC publications.
2017-06-17 00:17:11 UTC M 5.3 Andreanof Islands, Aleutian Isles ………. SS 07:55 UTC June 17
2017-06-10 16:19:52 UTC M 5.2 Santa Cruz Islands ……………………. DK 07:55 UTC June 172017-06-17 01:21:44 UTC M 5.0 New Ireland Region, P.N.G. …………….. DN 18:38 UTC June 17
2017-06-11 16:29:55 UTC M 5.1 Ascension Islands region ………………. SS 18:38 UTC June 172017-06-17 13:47:40 UTC M 5.3 Nicaragua ……………………………. DK 01:31 UTC June 17
2017-06-10 05:42:13 UTC M 5.7 Pacific Antarctic Ridge ……………….. SS 01:31 UTC June 172017-06-17 14:23:48 UTC M 5.0 Sulawesi, Indonesia …………………… SS 09:55 UTC June 17*
2017-06-17 15:36:00 UTC M 5.0 Antofagasta, Chile ……………………. DN 09:55 UTC June 17*
( Dusk on co-ordinates 138′ 34′ E – 6′ 30′ S Taroea Anim, Western P.N.G. …. 09:55 UTC June 17)2017-06-17 16:37:23 UTC M 5.0 Vanuatu ……………………………… SR 20:19 UTC June 17
2017-06-02 17:26:29 UTC M 5.1 Ryukyu Islands, Japan …………………. DN 20:19 UTC June 172017-06-17 19:50:04 UTC M 5.0 Western Turkey ……………………….. DK 19:42 UTC June 17
2017-06-04 18:46:11 UTC M 5.0 Volcano Islands, Japan ………………… SR 19:42 UTC June 172017-06-17 22:26:02 UTC M 6.1 South of Fiji Islands …………………. SR 18:41 UTC June 17
2017-06-11 16:29:55 UTC M 5.1 Ascension Islands …………………….. SS 18:41 UTC June 17As you can see, my kind of hypothesis doesn’t really have anything to do with mountains, piezo-electric ratios, or transmigration, though the latter may play a part in energy increases before detection. Looking at these correlations, one could come to the conclusion that earthquakes are self propagating and self triggering. I have spent many years trying to have this idea investigated by a recognised scientific body… but unfortunately, I still stand alone with my beliefs.
A class B 2.5 flux event occurred at 09:20 UTC (June 18), it was sunset in Palau, Indonesia and dawn in Northern Colombia… who knows! maybe I’ll get lucky 🙂
Sorry you had to wait for a response…
Score: 0115 pts115 ptslesterJune 16, 2017 at 9:35 pm #1803Hello Councelor, thank you for your questions, I have just spent the last 2 hours responding… unfortunately, my login time must have terminated on submit, thus deleting my reply. I shall try again over the weekend… I didn’t want you thinking I was ignoring you!
Score: 0115 pts115 ptslesterJune 14, 2017 at 11:46 pm #1796Addition to this forecast, two possible locations in the South Sandwich Islands Region
West of Bruce Ridge, -40.570 long – -60.690 lat 250km Radius
South Sandwich Trench, -28.220 long – 54.850 lat 250km Radius
Magnitude: 6 – 7
Period: Same as above
Thank you
Score: 0115 ptslesterJune 14, 2017 at 9:52 pm #1794I don’t wish to harp on this subject any longer than necessary, but the ACE satellite feed has just shut down. The mag monitor stopped at 19:48 UTC (June 14), time -8 LS = 19:40 UTC. At this time, it is Dusk on the 6.3 epicentre Western Turkey, and Dawn in Taroea Anim, Western P.N.G. “SO” believes a powerful solar storm incapacitated airports in the UK two weeks ago, I believe potential high mag seismic anomalies are causing disruption with the ACE and DSCOVR satellite feeds… does anybody have similar opinions ?
Score: 0115 ptslesterJune 14, 2017 at 5:17 pm #1792Thank you for your kind words, I have been monitoring this region for 3 weeks prior to the Turkey event. The scenario above has played out several times during this period. Energy retention has survived two 6+ quakes in the last 48 hours, so this is either an active target, or a propagation hub. I confirmed its active phase was still intact using data from the ACE EPAM Proton monitor this morning (my time), a spike in the 115-195 keV range attained close to 1.OE+O4 at 08:45 UTC. Time -8 LS = 08:37 UTC, Sunset on co-ordinates 138′ 34′ E – 6′ 30′ S Taroea Anim, Western P.N.G. occurred at 08:37 UTC (June 14).
If you combine this with the previously posted data, you have an indication that this could be a potential pre seismic location, or simply put… X marks the spot 🙂
Score: 0115 pts -
|
