M4.7 – 171km ENE of Miyako, Japan 2017-08-20 04:47:32 UTC at a depth of 10 km M4.8 – 225km NE of Port-Vila, Vanuatu 2017-08-20 10:09:07 UTC at a depth of 25.2 km
M4.6 – 99km SW of Huarmey, Peru 2017-08-19 03:22:31 UTC at a depth of 56.3 km M4.5 – 51km SSW of Ndoi Island, Fiji 2017-08-19 20:59:02 UTC at a depth of 591.2 km
M5.2 – 135km SSW of Gataivai, Samoa 2017-08-15 06:01:44 UTC at a depth of 10 km M5.1 – 80km W of Coquimbo, Chile 2017-08-15 19:03:21 UTC at a depth of 10.1 km
Yup,
I opened Counselors link above and “Oh boy, I will review this later” lol!
If you pull the highest mag. correlations out and put them in a separate section, it will be easier for me as I is pretty lazy.
Around the Fiji region is where we see the first signs of deep energy that has been released from the core, near the super plume in the lower mantel.
Stop ignoring my posts, Lester 🙂 I suppose I should provide clarification when I post images.
Just to add while it is on my mind, I have pieced together Blots original formula, a snippet:
Long term Energy Transmigration starts in the West Pacific
at the following pace:
2.6 km/day @ 600 km
0.9 km/day @ 200 km
0.5 km/day @ 33 km
Compare to the North American Migration speed:
120 – 140 m/day
Darn it!! They had better give me those monitors back, I am kinda disgruntled about that.
Just a coincidence, yes? Yes, NO! C’mon!
Why do they mess with me? I have some stories to share, but not at the moment, as I is busy
I cannot access the TEC maps for South America. Can you all? Hook Echo shuts down yet another, ha!
They have not realized it yet that they are just making that much better by deterring me. Turning me into an
earthquake forecasting machine!!
It would be a tough call without an image to source, as those images get scrapped and replaced throughout the day,
When I think I may have gotten something, I usually take some screenshots and cross check with various other monitors. They display some insane looking variations on those monitors at times, the latest B0 not an exception. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B83EkoitOiKQTVo2Q2diTmNWY0k/view?usp=sharing
How about I actually provide you a premise? Lol! I am losing my mind.
So, if we are focused on a particular region for limited amount of time, it would be within reason to provide time sets that are based off terminators, Sun/Moon shadows each respectively.
So I was toying with this notion before, I went to post a forecast noticed someone had created a post right before me identifying the same region.
In this case, Chile. So I thought to myself, how can I make my forecast slightly more accurate, or at the very least add something overall if the event was to occur.
I went ahead and added some of the most recent anomalies, but also this: Peak onset times UTC:
(Experimental)
07:00
11:00
12:16
17:00
22:29
Since I was rather spontaneous in tagging it on, and certainly did not want to be fumbling around and have the event occur before I finish the post (oh yeah, it happens) I just rattled off a few sets of times without any real checking or verifying. This is one way we can combine some of our efforts and methods. Perhaps you all can come up with more accurate onset times or perhaps a better way of doing/presenting. If it would improve accuracy and shown to be consistent, I personally would totally add this to my future forecasts or something similar. Thoughts?
Now I will be the first to state, ya it wasn’t all that large of a quake and even though it lines up well horizontally, still out there.
Maybe those seismo electric fields are indeed being amplified by the ocean and the appearance in size of the anomaly and the strength of the associated seismic event does not necessarily reflect one another in those terms. I will have to follow up on that.
Yup, Counselor. Fine job.
So, this is actually what I did awhile back, I just did not make a presentation of it.
Perhaps you may find the time?
I used this list: significant earthquakes 2017https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/browse/significant.php
and a few others.
Also if you can pull out a pattern and post the presentation for reference, etc. Like I did with the tec maps.
Yo management! An area where we can post these
sorts of things. Like a “Current Research” section or something with controlled access, not restricted..but controlled.
Idk, I need a soda, brb
This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by HookEcho.
“Are you able to source any regional TEC data for New Zealand ?” Well yes I suppose. the Southern Auroral Electrojet And/or the Southern Ovation Prime Energy Flux should provide you with more than enough 🙂
I came across another handful of the ionosphere regional maps and posted. The Russian maps I thought were impressive. I prefer regional when searching for potential anomalies, as they can become ‘smoothed over’ on the global maps.
IAG Institute of Applied Geophysics Russia Ionospheric Full Electronic Content (PES) And various other related ionosphere maps (regional): http://ipg.geospace.ru/tomo2.html
Hmm..impressive.
