Forum Replies Created

Viewing 25 posts - 2,626 through 2,650 (of 2,693 total)
  • Posted in:  
  • 115 pts
    lester
    June 13, 2017 at 11:15 pm #1786

    Magnetic compression recorded in Tromso magnetometer at 21:02 UTC June 13 ( flux.phys.uit.no )

    21:02 UTC -8 LS = 20:54 UTC

    19:40 UTC – 20:54 UTC relate to Dawn / Sunrise on co-ordinates 138′ 34′ E – 6′ 30′ S, Taroea Anim, Eastern P.N.G.

    We shall see… 🙂

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    June 13, 2017 at 10:30 pm #1785

    Okay, my confidence boosting speech brought the house down again, I wasn’t labelled delusional by one of the UK’s leading particle physicists for nothing… lets talk shop!

    It is agreed that the sun influences seismic activity on Earth, I recently posed the question “Can the Earth influence activity on the sun ?” Here’s a scenario I have been following for the last 3 days.

    Sunday June 11: I noted a significant aspect change had been recorded in online space weather data at 00:48 UTC (possible limb contact). A further aspect change was recorded at 02:14 UTC (second limb contact). I always associate unusual data changes with frequency correlations from the sun,
    making contact with Earth orbiting satellites at 8 minutes LS. I thus change the recorded times to 00:40 UTC and 02:06 UTC. The times relate to Dawn and Sunrise (positive limb contact) at co-ordinates 70′ 42′ E – 26′ 31′ S Triple Junction, Central Indian Ocean Ridge… I then post a forecast accordingly (Lester: June 11, 10:09 pm)

    Monday June 12: A magnitude 6.3 earthquake occurs of the coast of Western Turkey at 12:28:37 UTC, on co-ordinates 26.31 E – 38.85 N. Meanwhile, Sunset is occurring on co-ordinates 70′ 42′ E – 26′ 31′ S Triple Junction at 12:29:00 UTC.

    Tuesday June 13 (today): A class B 3.8 solar flare is recorded in the flux data, peaking maximum at 19:40:00 UTC. Again similarly to yesterday, it is exactly Dusk (limb contact) at co-ordinates 26.31 E – 38.85 N, epicentre of the 6.3 Turkey event !

    My hypothesis is mostly based on wavelength, I am currently trying to monitor 6 such scenario’s globally. Analysis of these correlations has determined seismic contact may occur on one of these locations in the next 30 days, on approximate co-ordinates 138′ E – 6′ S, somewhere in the Triton shoal region, Eastern P.N.G. Today on this location it is Dawn at 19:40:00 UTC.

    Are these coincidental happenings, or can anomalies within the Earth actually influence solar activity ?

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    June 12, 2017 at 10:11 pm #1784

    HookEcho, hope you don’t mind me being one step ahead, I took this to the chat room. I you feel it is a bad move, I’ll go with what ever you decide… in a bad mood because I forecast 26’E South of Africa, and missed Turkey 🙂

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    June 10, 2017 at 11:19 am #1761

    After the trio of 7.9’s in Bougainville, Solomon’s and New Zealand last fall, global seismic activity reduced dramatically over the following post event 12 hours… more so with the NZ event. It is as if retained energy in pre seismic anomalies, is redirected and channelled to the effected area, thus causing multiple aftershocks… does this sound feasible?

    I agree, the sun and Earth are interacting with each other… but at what level! It is generally accepted that the sun combined with other factors is the main contributor of seismic activity. But do you, or any other forecasters have an opinion about the possibility of the Earth actually instigating solar activity e.g. solar flares, coronal holes etc.

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    June 9, 2017 at 3:59 pm #1760

    Please disregard my last adjustment on this forecast, reworked data indicates this is more likely to be a mainland event on co-ordinates
    96.940 long – 4.245 lat, 20 km’s South of Takengon, North Sumatra.

    Thank you

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    June 8, 2017 at 6:46 pm #1748

    I have spent a rainy afternoon reading up on “upward transmigration of seismic energy” and its founder Claude Blot. This is a totally different method to my own, but my impression and conclusion thus far is that I have been hanging out with the wrong kind of scientists.

    Thank you for your direction and patience… I have now been brought up to speed 🙂

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    June 8, 2017 at 12:06 am #1744

    Magnitude for this prediction is decreased and reset as 5 – 6

    Thank you

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    June 7, 2017 at 2:44 pm #1743

    Forgive me, I truly am the persona of an old fool :).

    I have dealt with a lot of sceptics, which unfortunately leaves one with a certain degree of paranoia… I’m sure you can appreciate that. My query can wait… looks like there could be an increase in activity developing!

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    June 6, 2017 at 9:46 pm #1735

    I am afraid I’m not very good at making conversation on forums, or keeping up to speed as they say with how things work. So in reference to the latter… I apologise for intruding on your discussion thread.

    Thank you

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    June 6, 2017 at 11:43 am #1729

    I have always been of the belief that team effort is essential, for the development of a working theory on this subject. There are too many Variables, factors and probabilities for one person to “successfully” voice their idea’s. This will be the third time an attempt to solicit a gathering has been made on this forum. If you wish to chair a discussion with the aforementioned in mind… count me in!

    I have been trying to follow your hypothesis with interest, but inevitably I may miss pieces due to my own commitment. So apologies if you have covered this question before; Regarding your referral to “energy transmigration”, is this concerned with stress redistribution, a transfer of electromagnetic energy, or something else ?. There is the issue of open source here, so I will understand if an appropriate answer is not forthcoming!

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    June 5, 2017 at 11:01 pm #1717

    Adjustment to this prediction… co-ordinates reset as 95.940 long – 3.238 lat

    Period and magnitude remain unchanged

    Thank you

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    June 5, 2017 at 10:58 am #1712

    Thanks for the warning… appreciated

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    June 3, 2017 at 10:43 pm #1700

    2017-06-02 23:48:17 UTC, M 5.7 Eastern P.N.G., 145.14 E – 4.74 S
    Epicentre 390 km’s ENE of forecast co-ordinates (Lester: May 20 12:31 UTC)
    Prediction fell short of target by 140 kilometres.

    2017-06-03 11:47:24 UTC, M 5.3 Kamchatka Peninsula, 157.20 E – 50.93 N
    Epicentre 135 km’s SE of forecast co-ordinates (Lester: May 24 17:26 UTC)
    Prediction fell short of stated magnitude.

    2017-06-03 19:17:42 UTC, M 6.0 Balleny Islands Region, 155.68 E – 62.63 S
    Epicentre 291 km’s SSE of forecast co-ordinates (Lester: May 22 23:56 UTC)
    Prediction fell short of target by 41 kilometres.

    Hello Shelly, these predictions constitute the last 24 hours of failed activity. I am calculating my locations using TZ’s and PSL’s, I noticed today that likewise you have a prediction in Canada… so I believe we may have something in common. I was recently commenting to a fellow forecaster, I am a little past my best and not able to keep up with the pace required anymore, but I am still good for a few pointers if you decide to buy into this!

    I placed a forecast for 149′ E P.N.G. between April 12 – May 1. I repeated this between May 1 – May 20 and changed location to 147′ E. My current attempt is between May 20 – June 8 at co-ordinates 147′ E. I missed the 5.7 above by 140 kilometres because of a mistake… do you know what it was ?.

    This is my last communicate on this matter… I’ll leave you to predict in peace if that is your wish, and thank you for your help with the smiley issue 🙂

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    June 3, 2017 at 3:36 pm #1697

    If it was up to me…….!

    Good effort whatever the outcome 🙂

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    June 2, 2017 at 10:49 pm #1693

    Touche’ my friend… Lester: May 22 2017 19:13 UTC (smiley)

    My smiley is smiling… sincearly, I have not been able to find these symbols yet.

    You are using close range, if I am not being too forward, may I ask how you are choosing your locations ?

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    June 2, 2017 at 11:07 am #1686

    Magnitude for this prediction is increased and reset as 5 – 6.2

    Apologies for alterations… my math keeps indicating something heavy between 67 – 70 West longitude!

    Thank you

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    June 1, 2017 at 4:26 pm #1680

    As worthier cause as I have heard in a long time, however, I am past my peak these days, so I do not have the same confidence in my determinations as I once did… I wouldn’t want your friends getting under the table on my account LOL

    you have my respect!

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    June 1, 2017 at 4:03 pm #1678

    Sounds very interesting Richard, but please do tell for what purpose would you wish to make maps of my activity? I’m afraid I do not employ any migratory processes in the procurement of my forecasts. But that is not to say Seismic migration is not a feasible concept, my methods are mostly long term that mature with impulsive solar activity… basically watching for the right signs. I prefer using a small Radius because any successful determinations brings you closer to an advanced state, which will eventually surpass the law of averages and probability itself. An old tutor of mine use to say “it is better to try and place a small region on alert rather than a whole country”, the latter has been done before in Greece and it damaged the economy.

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    May 31, 2017 at 10:47 pm #1675

    My apologies, a coincidental happening… though it does give meaning to the phrase “small world” LOL

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    May 31, 2017 at 5:04 pm #1672

    Magnitude for NE Honshu, Japan is increased and reset as 5.5 – 6.5

    Thank you

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    May 30, 2017 at 12:26 am #1657

    Just to finish, the flare I wanted didn’t occur, however the ACE satellite mag feed stopped at 23:35 UTC (May 29). Data received by the satellite is 8 minutes old, so the stoppage actually occurred at 23:27 UTC… I got what I needed!!

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    May 29, 2017 at 9:11 pm #1656

    I blew my math on this occasion Fred, the equation altered after the M 6.8 in Sulawesi. SP 2659 will rotate out of view shortly, so all depends on solar activity at 22:10 UTC or 23:27 UTC +/- 10 minutes to save the day.

    I have to say, the topic you have delegated yourself to study is quite intriguing. I doubt I will be able to converse with you on this subject any time soon, but you have put me on the path to learning more about ley lines!

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    May 29, 2017 at 2:00 pm #1647

    Hi Fred

    I read your post with interest, Unfortunately ley lines and ancient aliens are not really my forte. However, earth facing quiet is within the realms of my own hypothesis. As it happens, I am in anticipation of a solar flare occurring at 20:26 UTC +/- 10 minutes (May 29), as part of an ongoing calculation… not much to ask for is it LOL. Should it occur, perhaps we’ll speak more… if not, then a few hours of number crunching will hit the trash again!

    Also, if you have taken the time to post a subject, you rightly deserve a response even if the answer is of no help to you!…

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    May 25, 2017 at 11:32 pm #1637

    Magnitude for this prediction is increased and reset as 5.5 – 6.5

    Thank you

    Score: 0
    115 pts
    lester
    May 22, 2017 at 1:06 pm #1628

    Thanks for your input Ben… it is appreciated.

    Score: 0
Viewing 25 posts - 2,626 through 2,650 (of 2,693 total)

Start typing and press Enter to search