Forum Replies Created
-
37 ptsHookEchoAugust 13, 2017 at 7:04 am #2504
M5.8 – 94km WSW of Coquimbo, Chile 2017-08-12 12:54:12 UTC at a depth of 6.6 km
Score: 0
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us2000a7kk#executive37 pts37 ptsHookEchoAugust 11, 2017 at 4:26 pm #2498M6.2 – 2km WSW of Tuy, Philippines 2017-08-11 05:28:25 UTC at a depth of 168.2 km
Score: 0
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us2000a77i#executive
just outside the encircled area, within 200 miles. General direction of ET correct.37 ptsHookEchoAugust 10, 2017 at 5:01 pm #2491Nah, I what I was getting at, is those faults acoustical frequencies matching aids in the process to the release of energy, the triggering of an event. But I don’t know. You know what? I don’t feel very well myself this morning. I haven’t slept very well this last week to add.
Score: 037 ptsHookEchoAugust 10, 2017 at 9:13 am #2485Counselor,
I was just pointing the quakes out e g Alaska. Sry if I wrote in that fashion that they are related. Well, they were but not in a predictive sense.
If we get two hard hitting 6 mags like the most recent, there is going to be some type of a response along the different faults.If you take notice of the cars that are around with the bass cranked way up, enough so the body panels are vibrating. As the bass hits varying lower and higher tones, certain panels vibrate along with certain tones. Well, the same can be applied to the faults. Each fault has its own frequency range that is going to get things moving. So it is basically quakes triggering other quakes.
Look at all those lower 5 mags and 4’s on the map right now. Unreal…unreal not one could hit the magnitude range on my forecast.
- This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by HookEcho.
37 ptsHookEchoAugust 9, 2017 at 1:01 pm #247713:01:29 Wednesday, August 9, 2017
Score: 0
Update Magnitude Range: M5.4 – M7.4
Updated Map: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B83EkoitOiKQaDdHclRFcHNEOEU/view?usp=sharing37 ptsHookEchoAugust 9, 2017 at 7:17 am #2474I have to take that back, there is a better candidate for transmigration: M5.1 – 55km WNW of Ishigaki, Japan 2017-08-04 11:19:46 UTC
at a depth of 67.0 km.However, it is tough to ignore the Dartang event for China, deep Afghanistan quake and smaller Kyrgyzstan quake before the 6+ mag in Kyrgyzstan. Then the %+ mag. quakes afterward that stomped along the fault up in Alaska.
Score: 037 ptsHookEchoAugust 9, 2017 at 7:03 am #2473Counselorgimber,
Score: 0
Nah that is just how they mark epicenters. Where did the those electrons go?
Suck -N- Dump: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B83EkoitOiKQdjgtWGNZcV9Jd0E/view?usp=sharing37 ptsHookEchoAugust 8, 2017 at 9:52 pm #2462Wassup Ya all?
The PNG quakes are migration from Solomon Islands to the NW. I would have to go with M4.9 Naha-shi, Japan as a precursor to M6.5 China. Or perhaps a deep quake that occurred in Japan within the last few years. Japan and China share a seismic teleconnection which has been the focus of many papers throughout the years. Most are behind paywalls unfortunately.
So check this out.
M5.0 – 36km E of Guican, Colombia 2017-08-08 20:43:41 UTC at a depth of 46.4 km.
At 20:45, positive and negative TEC hugging the the magnetic equator. Looks like a magnetic field line and a flux tube could fit right in there, which in turn reminds me of the Sun. “Earthspot” I shall name thee…
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B83EkoitOiKQQkVCQ1MwNkhpUEE/view?usp=sharing- This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by HookEcho.
- This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by HookEcho.
37 ptsHookEchoAugust 8, 2017 at 10:31 am #2445The lastly, the rate of change in TEC over the last 24 hrs:
Score: 0
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B83EkoitOiKQUEFBNHJSOVJyVWc/view?usp=sharing
Red ranks the highest..notice red is very close to the M5.3 Bodrum, Turkey 2017-08-08 @ 07:42:22 UTC. When I noticed all the smaller eq’s near the region earlier I thought to myself, they may see a larger seismic event soon. To add, the region stands out with a surface heat anomaly. I should rest now good morning and good night!37 ptsHookEchoAugust 8, 2017 at 7:30 am #2443Nice presentation above, Counselor, I hate to even state this, but the tec anomaly appeared 08/02. Unless you located another?
Oh here is something that slipped my mind.
The M5.7 Solomon Islands occurred @ 2017-08-06 00:15:10 UTC. Nearby station Willis Island detected a strong ionospheric scintillation
event just beforehand. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B83EkoitOiKQVU93SEVNb251MzQ/view?usp=sharingThe same day, M4.9 Halls Creek, Australia @2017-08-06 04:21:51 UTC: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us2000a5b3#executive
Located just above, The Darwin station shows a weak scintillation event, also prior to the seismic event.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B83EkoitOiKQU0R5REtxRnNVWEk/view?usp=sharingM4.6 New Zealand @ 2017-08-05 22:42:40 UTC: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us2000a597#executive
Nearby station Macquarie Island shows a spike/fluctuation in the Phase scintillation, also prior to the nearby seismic event.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B83EkoitOiKQdlZSSUZOUXlPUmM/view?usp=sharing“Macquarie Island scintillation monitor is generally a sign of auroral activity.” There wasn’t any!
“plasma bubbles” they state for the other two stations.Ya, that maybe so..I say they are also useful short term local earthquake detection stations!
Ionosphere scintillation and earthquakes: https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:43020064
And also that “Plasma bubbles” are formed when flux tubes pierce through the Ionsophere and are later depeleted.- This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by HookEcho.
37 ptsHookEchoAugust 8, 2017 at 6:01 am #2442Some of the TEC Anomaly Images, it was present for hours:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B83EkoitOiKQb1Q2RkxLYUgybmc/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B83EkoitOiKQTnpDcDl1MnBuQ2s/view?usp=sharingClose up:
Score: 0
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B83EkoitOiKQejczR2xrd0VhWUU/view?usp=sharing37 pts37 ptsHookEchoAugust 7, 2017 at 9:00 am #2429Three-dimensional distribution of ionospheric anomalies prior to three large earthquakes in Chile:
(Full Article)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304994222_Three-dimensional_distribution_of_ionospheric_anomalies_prior_to_three_large_earthquakes_in_Chile- This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by HookEcho.
37 ptsHookEchoAugust 7, 2017 at 8:28 am #2428Ionospheric Anomalies Observed by GPS TEC Prior to the Qinghai-Tibet Region Earthquakes:
(Full Article)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273680432_Ionospheric_Anomalies_Observed_by_GPS_TEC_Prior_to_the_Qinghai-Tibet_Region_Earthquakes- This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by HookEcho.
- This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by HookEcho.
37 ptsHookEchoAugust 7, 2017 at 8:19 am #2427Contrastive research of ionospheric precursor anomalies between Calbuco volcanic eruption on April 23
and Nepal earthquake on April 25, 2015:
(Full Article) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299362246_Contrastive_research_of_ionospheric_precursor_anomalies_between_Calbuco_volcanic_eruption_on_April_23_and_Nepal_earthquake_on_April_25_2015- This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by HookEcho.
- This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by HookEcho.
37 ptsHookEchoAugust 7, 2017 at 8:14 am #2426Space Weather Application Center(SWACI)
Ionospheric TEC Map EU:
http://swaciweb.dlr.de/data-and-products/public/tec/tec-eu/?L=1Global TEC Maps/Rate:
Score: 0
http://swaciweb.dlr.de/data-and-products/public/tec/tec-global/?L=137 pts37 ptsHookEchoAugust 7, 2017 at 7:25 am #2424Argh! I just knew the M5.7 – 52km WNW of Kirakira, Solomon Islands quake was deep enough that we would see migration to the NW, and would likely be of similar magnitude or slightly higher. M5.8 – 139km SW of Kokopo, Papua New Guinea. But I hesitated posting a forecast in regards. You would not believe how many M6’s I have missed this year because I have began to hesitate since that long lull in activity. It has really thrown me off. I should just start following my instincts more often.
I added some more map links, and will try and add some related papers so everyone gets an idea of what to look for and how to utilize those maps.
Score: 037 ptsHookEchoAugust 7, 2017 at 6:18 am #2423GIFINT (Geomagnetic Indices Forecasting and Ionospheric Nowcasting Tools)
Score: 0
foF2 value measured at Rome ionospheric station (regional):
http://ionos.ingv.it/gifint/fof2.htm37 ptsHookEchoAugust 7, 2017 at 6:17 am #2422SWS Ionospheric Scintillation Maps (regional, Australia):
http://www.sws.bom.gov.au/Satellite/1/1Trimble: Global Ionospheric Scintillation Map:
http://www.trimble.com/Positioning-Services/Ionosphere-Scintillation-map.aspxEmbrace: Ionospheric Scintillation over Brazil:
24 hour loop:Score: 0
37 pts37 ptsHookEchoAugust 6, 2017 at 7:42 am #2411GIRO GLOBAL IONOSPHERE RADIO OBSERVATORY
Score: 0
with Real-Time & Retrospective HF Ionospheric Sounding Data from Lowell DIDBase:
http://giro.uml.edu/37 ptsHookEchoAugust 6, 2017 at 7:29 am #2410EMBRACE – ionosphere above South America
TEC Map: http://www2.inpe.br/climaespacial/portal/tec-map-home/
24 hour loop: http://www2.inpe.br/climaespacial/portal/tec-map-daily-video/
TEC Map – Chart: http://www2.inpe.br/climaespacial/portal/tec-map-vertical-range-delay/
TEC Map – Vertical Range Delay: http://www2.inpe.br/climaespacial/portal/tec-map-vertical-range-delay/
Ionosondes: http://www2.inpe.br/climaespacial/portal/ionosondes-home/Low latitude TEC plots: http://lisn.igp.gob.pe/stations/realtime.php
Score: 037 ptsHookEchoAugust 6, 2017 at 7:19 am #2408Royal Observatory of Belgium
INTERACTIVE IONOSPHERIC MAPS: (Regional)
http://gnss.be/Atmospheric_Maps/dynamic_ionospheric_maps.phpTrimble Ionosphere Total Electron Content (TEC) Map:
http://www.trimble.com/Positioning-Services/Ionospheric-TEC-map.aspx- This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by HookEcho.
-
|