You, and T. Allen seem to be trading off in the big room anyway. That can’t be by chance. 🙂
Canyonrat… yes, that’s it…and it is the anomaly page mentioned in some of Ben’s forecasts as well. The image on 5/12 shows something closer to Nevada before it shifts again some more.
It was a lot of long term tracking, but I was mostly keeping to Ben’s model. Where I was trying to drill down was through observing the low pressure patterns, many smaller quakes occurring at deeper than 10 km, reviewing the M4 and M5 quakes that surrounded the area, looking at the quake history that occurred during solar cycle min/max, looking at rain/snowpack information too… Even tried to monitor when phi angle was shifting to see where in the western US would show an uptick on average as that phi angle shift occurred, as well major planet alignments which I have taken more seriously for this region lately as it related to my timing recently.
Then, I got side tracked by what looked like more immediate area closer to the coastline, but you will notice many of my previous California forecasts were focused on the backside of the sierras…
Looks like the spot I forecasted back on March 14 popped at 5.3 today. It’s too bad I can’t put in more time for this like I was for the July quake I forecasted last year.
Keep up your solid work Canyonrat! Always nice to see more people putting up forecasts. I don’t visit as often as I would like to, but the group in here is awesome!
Extending this forecast for an added 7 days for a total of 14 days from the initial forecast. Also, adjusting the potential to M7+. There was a M4.5 in Indian Hills, NV (just outside of Carson City, NV) that is right on my radius marker of 250 KM from Big Pine, CA (Owens Valley). Worries over it as being a foreshock.
Thanks for all you data, Lester! 🙂 Another set of 3.3 quakes back to back this morning. With all the links your making on this thread, I will be finding it hard not to keep checking on different sites for information today. Wish I could stay in here longer. Thanks again.
back to back M3.3 with clustering at Ventura, CA. Hoping this is going to be isolated, but similar clustering took place on the Garlock fault prior to the two big quakes in ridgecrest, CA. My above watch is still active. I will say this zone is now higher risk for an M6+ for a 250 KM radius around Oxnard, CA.
This reply was modified 5 years, 1 month ago by Counselor.
Haha… no sir! This I will do, when I can, for free. Not nearly as adept at this as I would like so I will keep checking in :-). Just want to be of help.
A 4.7 near Holister since this post! One of your spots from before.
.
